Supreme Court Upholds Daughter's Obligation to Maintain Parents Under Criminal Procedure Code — Clarifies Gender Neutrality in Maintenance Claims.

In Favour of Prosecution
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose when the respondent, a father, sought maintenance from his married daughter, the appellant, under section 125(1)(d) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The father claimed he was unable to maintain himself and requested a monthly allowance of Rs. 500. The appellant challenged the maintainability of the application, arguing that the law did not permit a father to claim maintenance from his daughter. The trial magistrate and the Bombay High Court upheld the father's claim, leading to the daughter's appeal to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court analyzed the language of section 125(1)(d), noting that the pronoun 'his' should be interpreted to include both males and females, thus allowing a father to claim maintenance from his daughter. The court emphasized the social obligation of children to support their parents, regardless of gender, and rejected the argument that a married daughter ceases to have obligations towards her parents. The court affirmed the High Court's decision, dismissing the appeal and directing the magistrate to consider the father's application on its merits. The ruling reinforced the principle that both sons and daughters have a duty to maintain their parents who are unable to support themselves.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Maintenance Obligations - Claim by Father from Daughter - Section 125(1)(d) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - The court held that a father can claim maintenance from his married daughter under section 125(1)(d), establishing that the pronoun 'his' includes 'her' as per the interpretation of relevant statutes. This interpretation aligns with the moral obligation of children to support their parents, ensuring that no parent is left destitute due to the gender of their children (Paras 335-337).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a father can claim maintenance from his married daughter under section 125(1)(d) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the High Court's ruling that a father can claim maintenance from his married daughter under section 125(1)(d) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Law Points

  • Maintenance obligations
  • Gender neutrality in law
  • Interpretation of statutes
  • Parental maintenance rights
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1987 LawText (SC) (02) 66

Criminal Appeal No. 378 of 1986

1987-02-18

Dutt, M.M., Oza, G.L.

1987 AIR 1100, 1987 SCR (2) 331, 1987 SCC (2) 278, JT 1987 (3) 46, 1987 SCALE (1) 379

V.N. Ganpule, A.M. Khanwilkar, A.S. Bhasme, G.B. Sathe

Dr. (Mrs.) Vijaya Manohar Arbat

Kashi Rao Rajaram Sawai and Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Claim for maintenance under section 125(1)(d) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Remedy Sought

Father sought maintenance from his married daughter.

Filing Reason

Father claimed inability to maintain himself.

Previous Decisions

Trial magistrate and High Court upheld the father's claim.

Issues

Whether a father can claim maintenance from his married daughter under section 125(1)(d).

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the law does not permit a father to claim maintenance from his daughter. Respondent contended that the pronoun 'his' includes 'her', allowing for such claims.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the pronoun 'his' in section 125(1)(d) includes both males and females, thereby allowing parents to claim maintenance from their daughters, reinforcing the moral obligation of children to support their parents.

Judgment Excerpts

The court held that a father can claim maintenance from his married daughter under section 125(1)(d). The pronoun 'his' in clause (d) of section 125(1) Criminal Procedure Code also indicates a female.

Procedural History

The father filed an application for maintenance, which was upheld by the trial magistrate and affirmed by the Bombay High Court, leading to the daughter's appeal to the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 125(1)(d)
  • Indian Penal Code: 2(y), 8
  • General Clauses Act: 13(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 — Search of Bag Without Independent Witnesses and No Compliance with Mandatory Notice Requirement. The court held that the mandatory requirement of Section ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Inconsistent Conviction. Conviction under Sections 148, 324/149 and 302/149 IPC Set Aside as Witnesses Contradicted Themselves and Mere Weapon Recovery Did Not Establish G...