Supreme Court Dismisses Special Leave Petition Against Interim Order of High Court — Upholds Practice of Granting Regular Permits. Citing the need for regular services, the court directed Regional Transport Authorities to act in accordance with the law under Section 57 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a special leave petition filed by Basant Roadways against an interim order of the Madhya Pradesh High Court. The petition was dismissed by the Supreme Court, which stated that it would not interfere with the High Court's interim order. The court expressed concern over the practice of granting temporary permits for stage carriages repeatedly, despite a clear need for regular services on certain routes. It noted that such practices could lead to undesirable results and emphasized that Regional Transport Authorities should take appropriate action by granting regular permits either through applications or suo motu under Section 57(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. The court hoped that the authorities would act in accordance with the law to address the needs of the travelling public.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Special Leave Petitions - Non-Interference in Interim Orders - Constitution of India, Article 136 - The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the interim order of the High Court in a special leave petition, emphasizing the nature of interim orders and the court's limited scope for intervention. Held that the petition was dismissed without interference (Paras 1003B).

B) Motor Vehicles Law - Temporary Permits - Practice of Granting Temporary Permits - Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, Section 57 - The court deprecated the repeated granting of temporary permits for stage carriages despite the evident need for regular services, indicating that such practices lead to undesirable outcomes. It directed that Regional Transport Authorities should grant regular permits in accordance with the law (Paras 1003B-C).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Supreme Court should interfere with the interim order of the High Court regarding the granting of temporary permits.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition, stating it would not interfere with the interim order of the High Court. The court deprecated the practice of granting temporary permits and directed Regional Transport Authorities to grant regular permits in accordance with the law.

Law Points

  • Interim orders
  • Special Leave Petitions
  • Temporary permits
  • Regular permits
  • Public interest
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1986 LawText (SC) (09) 22

Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 11638 of 1986

1986-09-30

E.S. Venkataramiah, G.L. Oza

1987 AIR 116, 1986 SCR (3) 1002, 1986 SCC (4) 504

B.K. Rawat, M.K. Dua, Aman Vachher, S.K. Mehta

Basant Roadways

State Transport Appellate Tribunal and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Special leave petition against an interim order of the High Court.

Remedy Sought

Basant Roadways sought to challenge the interim order of the High Court.

Filing Reason

The petition was filed to contest the High Court's interim order regarding permits.

Previous Decisions

The High Court's interim order was the subject of this special leave petition.

Issues

Whether the Supreme Court should interfere with the interim order of the High Court. The legality of granting temporary permits repeatedly.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued against the interim order of the High Court. The court emphasized the need for regular permits instead of temporary ones.

Ratio Decidendi

The court upheld the principle that interim orders of the High Court should not be interfered with in special leave petitions, and emphasized the need for regular permits under the Motor Vehicles Act to serve public interest.

Judgment Excerpts

The petition is dismissed. We, however, deprecate the practice of granting temporary permits repeatedly.

Procedural History

The case originated from a special leave petition filed against an interim order of the Madhya Pradesh High Court dated 12th September, 1986.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 136
  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1939: Section 57
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Notice Under Section 56(1) of Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971, Directing Authorities to Consider Explanation and Pass Final Orders. Court Holds That Pending Civil Dispute Does Not B...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Constable/Driver Candidate Declared Medically Unfit Due to Tattoo Mark. Recruitment in CISF Cannot Apply Discriminatory Standards for Tattoos; Religious Symbols Must Be Respected.