Supreme Court Upholds Right to Religious Freedom Against Compulsion to Sing National Anthem. Expulsion of Students for Refusing to Sing National Anthem Violates Fundamental Rights Under Articles 19(1)(a) and 25(1) of the Constitution.

In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved three children from the Jehovah's Witnesses sect who were expelled from school for refusing to sing the National Anthem due to their religious beliefs. They maintained that singing the anthem was against their faith, although they stood respectfully during its performance. Following their expulsion on July 26, 1985, the children's father sought intervention from the education authorities, which was unsuccessful, leading to a writ petition in the High Court. Both a single judge and a Division Bench of the High Court rejected their plea. The Supreme Court, upon appeal, held that the expulsion violated the children's fundamental rights under Articles 19(1)(a) and 25(1) of the Constitution. The court emphasized that there is no legal obligation to sing the National Anthem and that standing respectfully suffices as a sign of respect. The court also noted that the Kerala Education Act did not provide grounds for expulsion based on the children's religious beliefs. The judgment underscored the importance of protecting individual rights against compulsion in matters of conscience and religious practice, ultimately directing the authorities to re-admit the children to school and allow them to pursue their studies without hindrance.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Freedom of Speech and Expression - Infringement of Rights - Constitution of India, Art. 19(1)(a) - The expulsion of children from school for not singing the National Anthem due to their religious beliefs was held to violate their fundamental rights. The court emphasized that standing respectfully during the anthem suffices as a show of respect and does not constitute an offence under the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act. Held that the expulsion was unconstitutional (Paras 1.1, 1.2).

B) Constitutional Law - Freedom of Religion - Right to Practice Religion - Constitution of India, Art. 25(1) - The court recognized the right to freedom of conscience and the right to profess and practice religion, stating that genuine religious beliefs must be respected. The expulsion for not singing the anthem was deemed a violation of this right (Paras 2.1, 2.2).

C) Education Law - Misconduct in Schools - Kerala Education Act, 1959 - The court found no provision in the Kerala Education Act that justified the expulsion of students for their religious beliefs. The children were reported to be well-behaved and law-abiding, thus the expulsion was not warranted (Paras 3, 4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the expulsion of students for refusing to sing the National Anthem due to religious beliefs infringes their fundamental rights under Articles 19(1)(a) and 25(1) of the Constitution.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's judgment, and directed the re-admission of the children to school, affirming their right to not sing the National Anthem based on their religious beliefs.

Law Points

  • Fundamental Rights
  • Freedom of Speech
  • Freedom of Religion
  • National Anthem
  • Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act
  • Kerala Education Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1986 LawText (SC) (08) 10

Civil Appeal No. 870 of 1986

1986-08-11

O. Chinnappa Reddy, M.M. Dutt

1987 AIR 748, 1986 SCR (3) 518, 1986 SCC (3) 615

F.S. Nariman, T.S. Krishnamurthy Iyer, K.J. John, M. Jha, G. Viswanatha Iyer, Mrs. Baby Krishnan, P.S. Poti, E.M.S. Anam, James Vincent

Bijoe Emmanuel & Ors.

State of Kerala & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Petition challenging expulsion from school.

Remedy Sought

Re-admission to school and continuation of studies.

Filing Reason

Expulsion due to refusal to sing the National Anthem based on religious beliefs.

Previous Decisions

High Court rejected the appeal against expulsion.

Issues

Whether the expulsion of students for not singing the National Anthem infringes their fundamental rights. Whether standing respectfully during the National Anthem constitutes sufficient respect.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellants argued that their expulsion violated their fundamental rights to freedom of speech and religion. The respondents contended that the students' refusal to sing the anthem was disrespectful.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the expulsion of students for not singing the National Anthem due to genuine religious beliefs violated their fundamental rights under Articles 19(1)(a) and 25(1) of the Constitution. It emphasized that standing respectfully during the anthem is adequate and does not constitute an offence under the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act.

Judgment Excerpts

The Fundamental Rights of the appellants under Art. 19(1)(a) and 25(1) have been infringed and they are entitled to be protected. There is no provision of law which obliges anyone to sing the National Anthem nor is it disrespectful to the National Anthem if a person who stands up respectfully when the National Anthem is sung does not join the singing.

Procedural History

The appellants were expelled from school on July 26, 1985, filed a representation to the education authorities, which was rejected, leading to a Writ Petition in the High Court that was dismissed. The Supreme Court granted special leave to appeal.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Art. 19(1)(a), Art. 25(1)
  • Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1960: s. 3
  • Kerala Education Act, 1959: s. 36
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Debarment of Contractor Due to Lack of Natural Justice. The court found that the petitioner was not given an opportunity to be heard before being debarred under Section 14A(2) of the Karnataka Transparency in Public Pr...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Kerala Examines Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under IPC Sections 323, 341, and 308. Appeal Challenges Conviction Based on Injured Witness Testimony and Medical Evidence in Attempt to Murder Case Arising from Motorcycle Assault with...