Supreme Court Dismisses University Appeal on ESI Act Coverage — Employees in Printing Press Recognized as Eligible. Employees in the Department of Publications and Press of Osmania University are deemed eligible for benefits under the Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 as the department is classified as a factory.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose regarding the applicability of the Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 to the employees of the Department of Publications and Press of Osmania University. The Department was involved in printing various educational materials and employed around 100 individuals. The High Court had previously ruled in favor of the applicability of the ESI Act, setting aside a Single Judge's decision that had dismissed the University’s Writ Petition. The Supreme Court, upon reviewing the case, determined that the Department indeed constituted a 'factory' as per the definition in Section 2(12) of the ESI Act, as it engaged in a manufacturing process by printing textbooks and other stationery items. The Court noted that the definition of 'manufacturing process' aligns with that in the Factories Act, 1948, thus confirming the eligibility of the employees for ESI benefits. Consequently, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal of the University, affirming the High Court's decision and ordering costs against the University.

Headnote

A) Employees' State Insurance - Applicability of ESI Act - Employees of University Printing Press - The Department of Publications and Press of Osmania University is engaged in a manufacturing process as defined under the Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948, thus making its employees eligible for benefits under the Act. The High Court's affirmative ruling was upheld, confirming the department's status as a factory under Section 2(12) of the Act (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the provisions of the Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 are applicable to the employees working in the Department of Publications and Press of Osmania University.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal of Osmania University, affirming the High Court's ruling that the Department of Publications and Press is a factory under the Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948, thus making its employees eligible for benefits under the Act.

Law Points

  • Employees' State Insurance Act applicability
  • definition of factory
  • manufacturing process
  • coverage under ESI Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1985 LawText (SC) (10) 11

Civil Appeal No. 1079 of 1973

1985-10-08

V. Balakrishna Eradi, O. Chinnappa Reddy, V. Khalid

1986 AIR 466, 1985 SCR Supl. (3) 589, 1985 SCC (4) 514, 1985 SCALE (2) 696

B.R.L. Iyengar, G.N. Rao, T.C. Gupta, Attar Singh, M.S. Gujral, C.V. Subba Rao, R.N. Poddar, T.C. Sharma

Osmania University

Regional Director, Employees State Insurance Corporation

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Determination of applicability of ESI Act to university employees.

Remedy Sought

Osmania University sought to challenge the applicability of the ESI Act.

Filing Reason

The University contested a High Court ruling affirming ESI Act coverage.

Previous Decisions

The High Court had ruled in favor of ESI Act applicability, differing from a prior Single Judge's decision.

Issues

Applicability of ESI Act to university employees Definition of factory under ESI Act

Submissions/Arguments

The University argued against the applicability of the ESI Act. The respondents contended that the printing press constituted a factory under the Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that the Department of Publications and Press engaged in a manufacturing process, qualifying it as a factory under the Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948, thereby entitling its employees to ESI benefits.

Judgment Excerpts

The Department of Publications and Press of the University is engaged in carrying on a 'manufacturing process' in the printing of text-books, Journals, forms and other items of stationery. The employees are therefore eligible for the benefits under the said Act.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against the judgment and order dated 16.11.1972 of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Writ Appeal No. 345 of 1972.

Acts & Sections

  • Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948: 1(4), 2(12)
  • Factories Act, 1948: 2(k)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in Coal Mining Services Agreement Dispute — No Arbitration Agreement Exists Between Petitioner and Respondent. Court holds that a consortium agreement does not create privity of...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Widow's Claim Over Shares in Favor of Nominee Under Section 109A Companies Act — Nomination Confers Beneficial Ownership on Nominee to the Exclusion of Legal Heirs