Supreme Court Strikes Down Discriminatory Pay Scales for Senior Draughtsmen — Upholds Equal Pay Principle. The classification of Senior Draughtsmen into two groups with different pay scales based on seniority was found to be discriminatory and violated Article 14 of the Constitution.

In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved Senior Draughtsmen in the Ordnance Factories under the Ministry of Defence, who challenged the Government's decision to classify them into two groups with different pay scales based on seniority. The appellants contended that all Senior Draughtsmen performed the same work and discharged similar duties, thus there was no justification for the distinction made by the Government. The High Court dismissed their petition, asserting that it was within the Government's purview to fix different pay scales. The Supreme Court, however, found that the classification lacked any intelligible differentia and violated Article 14 of the Constitution. The Court emphasized that where all relevant considerations are the same, individuals holding identical posts should not be treated differently in terms of pay. The Court referred to previous judgments, including Randhir Singh v. Union of India, to support its reasoning. Ultimately, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal, directing the Government to fix the pay scale of the appellants at Rs. 425-700, thereby ensuring equal pay for equal work.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Equal Pay for Equal Work - Discrimination in Pay Scales - Constitution of India, Article 14 - The classification of Senior Draughtsmen into two groups with different pay scales based on seniority was found to be discriminatory as all were performing identical duties. The Court held that such differentiation violates the principle of equality enshrined in Article 14 and struck down the Government's order implementing the pay scale division (Paras 102-110).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the classification of Senior Draughtsmen into two groups with different pay scales based on seniority is discriminatory and violates Article 14 of the Constitution.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, striking down the Government's order that classified Senior Draughtsmen into two groups with different pay scales. The Court directed the Union of India to fix the pay scale of the appellants at Rs. 425-700 and awarded costs to the appellants.

Law Points

  • Equal pay for equal work
  • discrimination based on seniority
  • classification of employees
  • violation of Article 14
  • justification for different pay scales
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1985 LawText (SC) (05) 23

Civil Appeal No. 3121 of 1981

1985-05-01

Khalid, V., Sen, A.P.

1985 AIR 1124, 1985 SCR Supl. (1) 101, 1985 SCC Supl. 94, 1985 SCALE (1) 1091

M.K. Ramamurthi, H.S. Parihar, S.C. Maheshwari, T.V.S.N. Chari, R.N. Poddar

P. Savita

Union of India, Ministry of Defence

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge against the Government's classification of Senior Draughtsmen into two pay scales.

Remedy Sought

The appellants sought equal pay for all Senior Draughtsmen performing identical duties.

Filing Reason

The appellants contended that the classification based on seniority was unjustified and discriminatory.

Previous Decisions

The High Court dismissed the petition, asserting the Government's authority to fix different pay scales.

Issues

Whether the classification of Senior Draughtsmen into two groups with different pay scales is discriminatory. Whether the Government's order violates Article 14 of the Constitution.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellants argued that all Senior Draughtsmen performed the same work and should receive the same pay. The respondents contended that the Government had the authority to fix different pay scales based on seniority.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that where all relevant considerations are the same, individuals holding identical posts and discharging similar duties should not be treated differently in terms of pay, thereby reinforcing the principle of equal pay for equal work under Article 14.

Judgment Excerpts

Where all relevant considerations are the same, persons holding identical posts and discharging similar duties should not be treated differently. The classification between the two groups of Senior Draughtsmen is without any basis.

Procedural History

The appellants filed a Writ Petition in the High Court challenging the Government's order. The High Court dismissed the petition, leading to the appeal before the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 14, Article 39(d)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Direction on DJ Music Restrictions in Writ Petition Due to Lack of Pleadings and Impleadment. High Court's order restricting DJ music in public places was set aside as it exceeded the writ petition's scope and viola...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Civil Procedure Code Counter-Claim Dispute. Court Rules Counter-Claim for Injunction Maintainable Even on Different Cause of Action Under Order 8 Rule 6A CPC.