Supreme Court Upholds Eviction Policy for Slum Dwellers with Conditions — Right to Livelihood Affirmed. The Court affirmed that the right to life includes the right to livelihood, and eviction without alternative accommodation violates constitutional rights.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved two writ petitions filed by petitioners seeking to restrain the State of Tamil Nadu from evicting slum and pavement dwellers in Madras without providing alternative accommodation. The Tamil Nadu Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1971 was enacted to address slum conditions, and the petitioners alleged that approximately 450 huts were demolished without offering alternative housing. The State denied these allegations, asserting that alternative accommodation was always provided before eviction. The Court examined the relationship between the right to life and the right to livelihood, concluding that the latter is integral to the former. The Court noted the government's commitment to improving slum conditions and providing basic amenities. It directed that no evictions occur before December 31, 1985, and that the State must provide alternative accommodation to those who can prove residency before June 30, 1977. The Court expressed confidence in the government's ongoing efforts to support slum dwellers and did not find it necessary to issue further directives. The petitions were ultimately dismissed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Right to Life - Inclusion of Right to Livelihood - Constitution of India, 1950, Articles 21, 19(1)(e), 19(1)(g) - The Court held that the right to life includes the right to livelihood, emphasizing that deprivation of livelihood equates to deprivation of life. The eviction of slum dwellers without providing alternative accommodation was found to jeopardize their right to life, thus violating constitutional provisions (Paras 79 D-F, 80 A-B, 103 D-F, 108 C).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the right to life under Article 21 includes the right to livelihood and if eviction without alternative accommodation violates Articles 21 and 19(1)(e) and (g).

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court dismissed the writ petitions, affirming that the right to life includes the right to livelihood and that the State's policy on slum clearance was adequate. It directed that no evictions occur before December 31, 1985, and that the State must provide alternative accommodation to eligible individuals.

Law Points

  • Right to life
  • Right to livelihood
  • Eviction policy
  • Alternative accommodation
  • Slum clearance
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1985 LawText (SC) (07) 9

Writ Petition Nos. 8927 & 9380 of 1981

1985-07-10

Chandrachud, Y.V.

1986 AIR 204, 1985 SCR Supl. (2) 100, 1985 SCC (3) 536, 1985 SCALE (2) 31

C.S. Vaidyanathan, Prabir Choudhary, M.S. Ganesh, R. Venkataramani, L.N. Sinha, K.G. Bhagat, A.V. Rangam

K. Chandru etc.

State of Tamil Nadu & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging the eviction of slum dwellers without alternative accommodation.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought a writ of mandamus to restrain evictions and provide basic amenities.

Filing Reason

Allegations of eviction without alternative accommodation for slum dwellers.

Issues

Whether the right to life includes the right to livelihood Whether eviction without alternative accommodation violates constitutional rights

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued for the necessity of alternative accommodation before eviction. State asserted that alternative accommodation was always provided.

Ratio Decidendi

The right to life under Article 21 includes the right to livelihood, and eviction without providing alternative accommodation violates Articles 21 and 19(1)(e) and (g).

Judgment Excerpts

The right to life includes the right to livelihood. The sweep of the right to life conferred by Article 21 is wide and far reaching.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed writ petitions seeking to restrain the State from evicting slum dwellers without providing alternative accommodation.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: 21, 19(1)(e), 19(1)(g)
  • Tamil Nadu Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act: 3, 5, 11(a), 29
  • Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act: 2
  • Madras City Municipal Corporation Act: 220-222
  • Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act: 17
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Dr. Rajkumar Kidnapping Case — Evidence Lacks Credibility and Corroboration. Prosecution Failed to Prove Charges Under IPC, Arms Act, and Explosive Substances Act Beyond Reasonable Doubt...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Addresses Pollution of Ganga Water and Municipal Responsibility — Court mandates municipal authorities to enforce pollution control measures.