Supreme Court Quashes Termination of Employee in Public Sector Undertaking — Upholds Right to Equality in Employment. The termination was found to be arbitrary and not in accordance with the principles of natural justice, violating the appellant's fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 16.

In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from the termination of the appellant's service as a Store Keeper in the Oil and Natural Gas Commission (ONGC). Initially appointed in 1962, the appellant was confirmed in service after completing his probation in 1965. However, his services were terminated in 1967, which he challenged in a writ petition. The High Court dismissed his petition, stating that he was a temporary employee and that the termination was valid. The Supreme Court, however, found that the termination was arbitrary and violated the principles of natural justice, as the appellant was not given a chance to defend himself against allegations of unsatisfactory work. The court emphasized that the ONGC, being an instrumentality of the State, was bound by the principles of equality in public employment under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution. The court quashed the High Court's judgment and awarded the appellant Rs. 2 lakhs as compensation for back wages and reinstatement, also entitling him to relief under Section 89 of the Income Tax Act due to the nature of the compensation awarded. The decision underscored the importance of fair treatment in employment and the protection of workers' rights against arbitrary actions by employers.

Headnote

A) Employment Law - Termination of Service - Validity of Termination - Constitution of India, 1950, Articles 14, 16 - The appellant's termination was found to be arbitrary and not in accordance with the principles of natural justice, as he was not given an opportunity to defend against allegations of unsatisfactory work. The court held that the termination violated his fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 16, leading to the quashing of the High Court's decision (Paras 874-877).

B) Employment Law - Compensation for Wrongful Termination - Income Tax Act, 1961, Section 89 - The appellant was awarded compensation of Rs. 2 lakhs in lieu of back wages and reinstatement, with the court directing that he is entitled to relief under Section 89 of the Income Tax Act due to the nature of the compensation awarded (Paras 878-879).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the termination of the appellant's service was lawful and whether he was entitled to relief under the Income Tax Act.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court quashed the High Court's judgment, held the termination was illegal, and directed the ONGC to pay Rs. 2 lakhs to the appellant as compensation in lieu of back wages and reinstatement within four weeks.

Law Points

  • Writ jurisdiction
  • termination of service
  • principles of natural justice
  • equality in public employment
  • compensation for wrongful termination
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1985 LawText (SC) (04) 35

Civil Appeal No. 3187 of 1982

1985-04-23

D.A. Desai, Rangnath Misra

1985 AIR 1046, 1985 SCR (3) 869, 1985 SCC (3) 153

A.R. Gupta, B. Datta, Rishi Kesh, Badri Prasad, Ajit Pudissary, Girish Chandra, Ms. A. Subhashini

K.C. Joshi

Union of India and Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the termination of service.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought reinstatement and compensation for wrongful termination.

Filing Reason

The appellant's service was terminated without proper procedure and justification.

Previous Decisions

The High Court dismissed the appellant's writ petition, upholding the termination.

Issues

Legality of termination of service Entitlement to compensation and relief under Income Tax Act

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the termination was arbitrary and violated principles of natural justice. The respondents contended that the termination was valid as per the terms of service.

Ratio Decidendi

The termination of service was arbitrary and violated the principles of natural justice, infringing the appellant's fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

Judgment Excerpts

The Oil and Natural Gas Commission is directed to pay Rs.2 lakhs to the appellant in lieu of backwages and compensation in lieu of reinstatement within a period of four weeks. If the appellant was appointed on regular basis, his service cannot be terminated by one month’s notice.

Procedural History

The appellant's service was terminated on December 29, 1967. He filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court, which was dismissed. The Supreme Court granted special leave to appeal.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 14, 16, 310, 311
  • Income Tax Act: Section 89
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case on Applicability of Section 40A(3) — Cash Payment for Property Purchase Not Disallowable as Business Expenditure. Section 40A(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961 applies only to revenue expenditure, n...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit Between Brothers Over Property Dispute. High Court Directions on Common Areas and Terrace Rights Upheld as Consistent with Will and Evidence.