Supreme Court Dismisses Employees' Claim for Customary Bonus — No Legal Right Established. Employees' claim for customary bonus was rejected as it did not meet the legal criteria established for such bonuses under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose between two employees of the United Bank of India and the bank regarding the entitlement to a customary bonus paid annually on the eve of Pooja. The employees contended that they had received this bonus for over 16 years, irrespective of the bank's profits, and argued that this established a legal right to the bonus as a condition of service. The bank contested this claim, asserting that the bonus was not customary but rather a result of negotiations and related to the bank's profitability. The Labour Court dismissed the employees' application, stating that there was no existing right to a customary bonus, and the Supreme Court was called upon to review this decision. The Supreme Court upheld the Labour Court's findings, emphasizing that the payments did not satisfy the legal tests for a customary bonus, which include consistent payment over years, uniformity in rate, and independence from profit. The court noted that the concept of a customary bonus was not applicable to nationalised banks, as they are government-owned entities and must maintain uniformity in employee benefits across all banks. Ultimately, the court dismissed the appeal, affirming that the employees had not established a legal right to the claimed bonus under the Industrial Disputes Act.

Headnote

A) Industrial Disputes - Customary Bonus - Legal Right to Customary Bonus - Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 33-C(2) - Employees claimed entitlement to a customary bonus based on long-standing practice; however, the court found that the payments did not meet the legal criteria for customary bonuses as they were contingent on profit and not uniformly paid. Held that the claim was not maintainable under the Act (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the bonus paid to the employees constituted a customary bonus under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming that the employees did not have a legal right to the customary bonus as claimed, and that the payments did not meet the legal criteria for customary bonuses under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

Law Points

  • customary bonus
  • Industrial Disputes Act
  • 1947
  • section 33-C(2)
  • tests for customary bonus
  • nationalised banks
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1985 LawText (SC) (04) 22

Civil Appeal No. 1416 of 1981

1985-04-30

Khalid, V., Desai, D.A., Eradi, V. Balakrishna

1985 AIR 1010, 1985 SCR (3) 1057, 1985 SCC Supl. 26, 1985 SCALE (1) 972

M.K Ramamurthi, Amlan Ghosh, G.B. Pai, V.S. Desai, D.N. Mukherjee, N.R. Chaudhary, R. Mukherjee

Upendra Chandra Chakraborty and Anr.

United Bank of India

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Claim for customary bonus by employees of a nationalised bank.

Remedy Sought

Employees sought payment of customary bonus.

Filing Reason

Claim based on long-standing practice of receiving bonus.

Previous Decisions

Labour Court dismissed the application for lack of legal right.

Issues

Entitlement to customary bonus Legal criteria for customary bonus

Submissions/Arguments

Employees argued that the bonus was customary and unrelated to profits. Bank contended that the bonus was based on negotiations and related to profits.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the bonus payments did not constitute a customary bonus as they were contingent on profit and did not meet the established legal criteria for such bonuses.

Judgment Excerpts

the bonus received by the appellants did not have the characteristic of customary bonus as known to law the concept of any customary bonus is unknown to nationalised banks

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against the decision of the Central Government Labour Court at Calcutta dated 28.12.1975, which dismissed the application made under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

Acts & Sections

  • Industrial Disputes Act, 1947: 33-C(2)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Transfer Pricing Case, Upholds Tribunal's Selection of Comparables. The Court held that the Tribunal's exclusion and inclusion of comparables based on functional analysis was correct and did not give ri...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission Order in Customs Duty Case — Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Speaking Order. Settlement Commission's order set aside for failing to consider submissions and provide r...