Supreme Court Allows Petition for Shifting Graves to Maintain Public Order — Balancing Religious Rights with Societal Needs. The Court found that shifting graves does not violate fundamental rights as religious practices are subject to public order under Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution.

  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose between the Shia and Sunni communities in Varanasi regarding the performance of religious rites on a plot of land. The Supreme Court had previously restrained the Sunni community from interfering with the Shia community's religious practices. However, incidents of violence during religious ceremonies led to concerns about public order. To address this, the Court appointed a committee to explore the feasibility of shifting two graves to separate the places of worship of both sects. The committee found the suggestion feasible, leading the Shia community to petition for its implementation. The Court ruled that shifting the graves would not infringe on the Sunnis' fundamental rights, as religious rights are subject to public order. The Court emphasized that the shifting was necessary to maintain peace and prevent violence during religious ceremonies. The Court directed the District Magistrate to oversee the operation, ensuring it was conducted respectfully and completed before the next Moharram festival. The Shia community agreed to bear the costs of the operation, and the Court's order was binding on both communities while not affecting third-party rights.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Religious Rights - Public Order - Shifting of Graves - Constitution of India, Articles 25 and 26 - The Court held that the suggestion to shift graves is not irreligious and does not violate fundamental rights, as religious rights are subject to public order. The decision aimed to resolve ongoing conflicts between sects and ensure peaceful religious practices (Paras 69-71).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the suggestion to shift graves for maintaining public order infringes on the fundamental rights of the Sunni community.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court allowed the petition for shifting the graves, directing the District Magistrate to oversee the operation and ensuring it was completed respectfully before the Moharram festival.

Law Points

  • Public order
  • religious rights
  • shifting of graves
  • fundamental rights
  • injunction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1983 LawText (SC) (09) 2

Civil Misc. Petition No. 4939 of 1983, Writ Petition No. 4675 of 1978

1983-09-23

Tulzapurkar, V.D., Desai, D.A., Sen, A.P.

1983 AIR 1268, 1984 SCR (1) 64, 1984 SCC (1) 81, 1983 SCALE (2) 704

A. K. Sen, Mrs. Urmila Kapoor, Hashan Imam, F.S. Nariman, M. Qamaruddin, Altaf Ahmed, Rizwan Hafiez

Gulam Abbas and Others

State of U.P. and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition regarding religious rights and practices of Shia and Sunni communities.

Remedy Sought

Shia community sought directions to shift graves to maintain public order.

Filing Reason

Concerns over violence and public order during religious ceremonies.

Previous Decisions

Earlier injunctions restrained Sunni community from interfering with Shia practices.

Issues

Whether shifting graves infringes on fundamental rights Whether the Court has jurisdiction to direct the shifting of graves

Submissions/Arguments

Shia community argued for shifting graves to maintain peace Sunni community opposed the shifting, citing infringement of rights

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that religious rights are subject to public order, and shifting graves for maintaining peace does not violate fundamental rights.

Judgment Excerpts

The suggestion to shift the two graves cannot be regarded as irreligious or destructive of any fundamental rights of the Sunnis. The religious rights of every person and every religious denomination are subject to 'public order'. The impugned suggestion merely seeks to shift those two graves from their present location to the southern side.

Procedural History

The case originated from Writ Petition No. 4675 of 1978, with subsequent petitions for directions arising from ongoing disputes between the Shia and Sunni communities.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: 25, 26
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 144, 176(3)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Trawler Masters for Fishing Violations — Confiscation of Vessels Mandated.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder and Atrocities Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Doubtful Caste Status of Victim. Conviction under Section 302 IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of SC/ST Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt bey...