Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Cooperative Society Election Dispute — Upholds Elected Members' Term. The court ruled that the term of elected members begins only upon declaration of election results, invalidating the administrator's appointment.

In Favour of Accused
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from the management of a cooperative society registered under the U.P. Cooperative Societies Act, 1965. The appellants challenged the appointment of an administrator after the term of the committee was claimed to have expired. The poll for new members was held on September 11, 1978, but the results were withheld due to an injunction from a court, which was only lifted when the results were declared on January 28, 1980. The appellants argued that their term should be calculated from the date of result declaration, leading to an expiration on June 30, 1982. The High Court ruled that the term commenced from the date of the poll, thus supporting the administrator's appointment. The Supreme Court, however, held that the term of office for elected members could not begin until they were declared elected. The court clarified that the election process includes the declaration of results, and since the results were declared on January 28, 1980, the term would indeed expire on June 30, 1982. The court quashed the administrator's appointment, reinstated the elected members, and emphasized the sanctity of the election process in cooperative societies. The appeal was allowed, and the High Court's judgment was set aside.

Headnote

A) Cooperative Societies - Election Process - Term of Office - U.P. Cooperative Societies Act, 1965, Section 29(2) - The term of elected members cannot commence until the election result is declared. The court held that the term began from the cooperative year starting July 1, 1979, and ending June 30, 1980, expiring on June 30, 1982, thus invalidating the appointment of an administrator (Paras 208-216).

B) Cooperative Societies - Statutory Interpretation - Section 29(4)(b) - The provision does not apply as the election process had commenced with the poll. The court emphasized that the election must progress to the declaration of results, and the administrator's appointment was illegal (Paras 216-217).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

From what date does the term of the elected members of the committee of management commence?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, quashed the order appointing the administrator, and declared that the term of the committee of management had not expired, directing the administrator to hand over charge to the elected Chairman.

Law Points

  • Election process
  • term commencement
  • cooperative societies
  • statutory interpretation
  • injunction impact
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1982 LawText (SC) (02) 23

Civil Appeal No. 478 of 1982

1982-02-11

Desai, D.A., Sen, A.P., Islam, Baharul

1982 AIR 831, 1982 SCR (3) 207, 1982 SCC (1) 671, 1982 SCALE (1) 411

S.N. Singh, G.N. Dikshit, Shoba Dikshit

Ram Pyare Chaudhary & Anr.

State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to the appointment of an administrator for a cooperative society.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the order appointing an administrator and reinstatement of elected members.

Filing Reason

The term of the committee was claimed to have expired, leading to the appointment of an administrator.

Previous Decisions

The High Court upheld the appointment of the administrator, stating the term commenced from the date of the poll.

Issues

Commencement of term for elected members Validity of administrator's appointment

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the term should start from the declaration of results. Respondents contended that the term commenced from the date of the poll.

Ratio Decidendi

The term of elected members of a cooperative society commences only upon declaration of election results, not from the date of the poll.

Judgment Excerpts

The term of office as member cannot begin to run unless the status of being a member is acquired on being declared elected. The election process is sacrosanct and members elected must be permitted to discharge their functions as chosen representatives of the electorate for the statutorily prescribed term.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against the High Court's judgment dated August 3, 1981, which upheld the appointment of an administrator after the term of the committee was claimed to have expired.

Acts & Sections

  • U.P. Cooperative Societies Act, 1965: 29(2), 29(4)(b)
  • U.P. Cooperative Societies Rules, 1968: 444(1), 445(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Extended Period Demand Under Section 11A of Central Excise Act — Suppression of Facts Justifies Extended Limitation. Forgings Classified Under Chapter 84 as Machinery Parts, Not Eligible for Exe...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeals in Income Tax Assessment Case — Clarifies Tax Liability on Rental Income and Validity of Trust.