Supreme Court Upholds Petition for Equal Pay for Equal Work — Court mandates equal pay for Delhi Police drivers.

In Favour of Prosecution
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a petition filed by a driver constable in the Delhi Police Force, who sought equal pay with drivers in other government departments. The petitioner, after serving in the army, was appointed as a driver in the Delhi Police and claimed that he performed the same duties as drivers in other departments but received a lower pay scale. The pay scale for driver constables in the Delhi Police was Rs. 210-270 for non-matriculates and Rs. 225-308 for matriculates, while other departments offered higher scales. The petitioner argued that the Third Pay Commission failed to consider their case adequately, leading to discrimination. The respondents contended that the petitioner was merely a constable and that different departments justified different pay scales. The Court analyzed the constitutional provisions regarding equality and the principle of equal pay for equal work, emphasizing that the duties of driver constables were as arduous as those in other departments. The Court rejected the respondents' arguments, stating that the principle of equal pay for equal work is not abstract but substantive and should be applied in this case. Ultimately, the Court allowed the writ petition, directing the respondents to fix the pay scale of the petitioner and other driver constables to be at least equal to that of drivers in the Railway Protection Force, effective from January 1, 1973.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Equal Pay for Equal Work - Application of the principle - Constitution of India, 1950, Articles 14, 16, 39(d) - The Court held that the principle of equal pay for equal work is a constitutional goal and should be applied to ensure that driver constables in the Delhi Police Force receive pay comparable to that of drivers in other departments performing similar duties. The Court found no rational basis for the differential pay scales and directed equalization of pay. (Paras 304-307).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the principle of equal pay for equal work applies to driver constables in the Delhi Police Force compared to drivers in other departments.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court allowed the writ petition and directed the respondents to fix the pay scale of the petitioner and other driver constables of the Delhi Police Force at least on par with that of the drivers of the Railway Protection Force, effective from January 1, 1973.

Law Points

  • Equal pay for equal work
  • Article 14
  • Article 16
  • Article 39(d)
  • Directive Principles of State Policy
  • Writ under Article 32
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1982 LawText (SC) (02) 16

Writ Petition No. 4676 of 1978

1982-02-22

O. Chinnappa Reddy, A.P. Sen, Baharul Islam

1982 AIR 879, 1982 SCR (3) 298, 1982 SCC (1) 618

M.S. Ganesh, N.C. Talukdar, R.N. Poddar, Miss A. Subhashini

Randhir Singh

Union of India & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking equal pay.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner sought a writ directing equal pay for driver constables.

Filing Reason

Claims for better pay scales were not addressed by the Third Pay Commission.

Previous Decisions

The Pay Commission did not consider driver constables as a separate category.

Issues

Application of equal pay for equal work principle Discrimination in pay scales among similar job roles

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued for equal pay based on identical duties and responsibilities. The respondents contended that different departments justified different pay scales.

Ratio Decidendi

The principle of equal pay for equal work is a substantive constitutional goal, applicable when individuals perform identical duties under the same employer, regardless of departmental distinctions.

Judgment Excerpts

'Equal pay for equal work' is not a mere demagogic slogan. It is a constitutional goal capable of attainment through constitutional remedies by the enforcement of constitutional rights. 'The principle of equal pay for equal work is deducible from those Articles and may be properly applied to cases of unequal scales of pay based on no classification or irrational classification.'

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution after unsuccessful representations to the authorities regarding pay scales.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 14, 16, 39(d)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Matrimonial Petition from Kalyan to Jalgaon on Grounds of Wife's Convenience and Hardship. Wife's Convenience Given Precedence in Transfer of Divorce Proceedings Under Section 24 CPC and Section 19 Hindu Marriage ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Restores Single Judge's Decision on Arbitration Award in Construction Dispute. The court held that the determination of compensation for delay under Clause 2 was exclusively within the jurisdiction of the Superintending Engineer, thus e...