Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Regarding Sales Tax Classification of Biscuits. The Court found that biscuits do not fall under the definition of 'cooked food' as per the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948, and upheld the tax classification.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from the classification of biscuits for sales tax purposes under the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948. The appellant, a registered firm engaged in manufacturing biscuits, contended that their turnover should be taxed at a lower rate of 2% applicable to 'cooked food' as per a notification issued on October 6, 1971. The assessing authority rejected this claim, imposing a higher tax rate of 3.5% on the turnover, classifying biscuits as an unclassified commodity. The appellant's appeals to the Deputy Commissioner and the Judge (Appeal) Sales Tax were unsuccessful, leading to an appeal to the Supreme Court. The core legal question was whether biscuits could be considered 'cooked food' under the relevant notification. The appellant argued that biscuits, being baked, should fall under the definition of cooked food. However, the Court noted that in common parlance, biscuits are not regarded as cooked food, and the Hindi version of the notification reinforced this interpretation. The Court cited previous judgments that supported the view that biscuits do not qualify as cooked food. Ultimately, the Supreme Court upheld the lower courts' decisions, dismissing the appeal and affirming the classification of biscuits as an unclassified commodity subject to the higher tax rate.

Headnote

A) Sales Tax - Classification of Goods - Definition of 'Cooked Food' - U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948, Section 3-A(2) - The Court held that 'biscuit' cannot be classified as 'cooked food' as per the notification, since it is not understood as such in ordinary parlance in Uttar Pradesh. The item was correctly treated as an unclassified commodity and taxed accordingly (Paras 151F-G-H).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether 'cooked food' includes 'biscuits' under the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the classification of biscuits as an unclassified commodity and upholding the higher tax rate of 3.5%. No costs were awarded.

Law Points

  • Sales Tax classification
  • ordinary parlance interpretation
  • cooked food definition
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1981 LawText (SC) (07) 4

Civil Appeal No. 3133 of 1979

1981-07-28

Venkataramiah, E.S., Pathak, R.S., Eradi, V. Balakrishna

1981 AIR 1656, 1982 SCR (1) 149, 1981 SCC (3) 542, 1981 SCALE (3) 1101

G.L. Sanghi, Bharat Ji Aggarwal, Naresh Kumar Sharma, Vineet Kumar, S.C. Manchanda, Mrs. Sobha Dixit

Annapurna Biscuit Manufacturing Co.

Commissioner of Sales Tax, U.P.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal regarding sales tax classification of biscuits

Remedy Sought

Tax classification of biscuits at a lower rate

Filing Reason

Dispute over sales tax rate applicable to biscuits

Previous Decisions

Lower courts upheld higher tax rate on biscuits

Issues

Interpretation of 'cooked food' under sales tax law Classification of biscuits for tax purposes

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that biscuits should be classified as cooked food due to the baking process Respondent maintained that biscuits do not fall under the definition of cooked food

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that the interpretation of tax law must align with ordinary parlance in the relevant jurisdiction, and biscuits do not qualify as 'cooked food' under the U.P. Sales Tax Act.

Judgment Excerpts

In the context and background of the notification 'biscuit' cannot be treated as 'cooked food'. It is a well settled rule of construction that the words used in a law imposing a tax should be construed in the same way in which they are understood in ordinary parlance.

Procedural History

The appellant's claim was rejected by the Assistant Commissioner, leading to unsuccessful appeals to the Deputy Commissioner and the Judge (Appeal) Sales Tax, followed by a dismissal by the Allahabad High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948: Section 3-A(2)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Evidence. Conviction under Sections 147, 148, 323, 302 read with 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Franchise Dispute — Upholds Award on Refund of Security Deposit and Interest but Sets Aside Award on Loss of Profit and Other Claims. Court holds that arbitrator's findings on breach...