Supreme Court Interprets Agricultural Produce Market Rules — Fees Not Payable Under Certain Conditions. The court clarified that fees under Rule 49 are not applicable if agricultural produce meets the conditions specified in Rule 48(2) of the Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Rules, 1965.

In Favour of Accused
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose regarding the interpretation of the Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Rules, 1965, specifically concerning the applicability of fees under Rule 49. The petitioners challenged the imposition of fees when agricultural produce was brought into the market area under certain conditions outlined in Rule 48. The court examined the provisions of Rules 48 and 49, noting that Rule 49 stipulates fees on agricultural produce upon entry into the market area, but Rule 48(2) provides exemptions for produce brought in for use by industrial concerns or for export, provided a declaration and certificate are obtained. The court found that the parties agreed that Rule 49 did not apply if the produce met the conditions of Rule 48(2). After considering the arguments, the court accepted this interpretation, confirming that Rule 49 would not apply in such cases. The appeal was partly allowed to this extent, with no costs awarded. The judgment clarified the conditions under which fees are not payable, emphasizing the importance of the language used in the rules.

Headnote

A) Agricultural Law - Fees on Agricultural Produce - Interpretation of Rules 48 and 49 - No fees payable under Rule 49 if conditions of Rule 48(2) are met - Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Rules, 1965, Rules 48, 49 - The court held that if agricultural produce is brought into the market area for use by industrial concerns or for export, and a declaration and certificate are obtained, no fees are payable under Rule 49. This interpretation aligns with the language of the rules and clarifies the application of fees (Paras 763-764).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether fees are payable under Rule 49 of the Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Rules, 1965 when agricultural produce is covered by sub-rule (2) of Rule 48.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court accepted the interpretation that no fees are payable under Rule 49 if the agricultural produce is covered by sub-rule (2) of Rule 48, thereby partly allowing the appeal.

Law Points

  • Interpretation of rules
  • agricultural produce fees
  • market area entry
  • exemption conditions
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1981 LawText (SC) (02) 33

Civil Appeal No. 1967 of 1975

1981-02-05

Koshhal, A.D., Eradi, V., Balakrishna, J., Misra, R.B.

1981 AIR 1102, 1981 SCR (2) 761, 1981 SCC (2) 418, 1981 SCALE (1) 426

Soli J. Sorabji, Vimal Dave, Subhash Parikh, Gopal Subharamaniyan, S. H. Sheth, M. V. Goswami, Ambrish Kumar, Mukesh Goswami, J. L. Nain, M. N. Shroff, S. C. Patel

Chhanganlal Mansukhlal & Anr.

K. K. Bhatt & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Interpretation of agricultural market rules regarding fee applicability.

Remedy Sought

Clarification on fee applicability under the Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Rules.

Filing Reason

Challenge to the imposition of fees under Rule 49.

Previous Decisions

The Gujarat High Court's decision was appealed.

Issues

Interpretation of Rule 49 applicability Conditions under which fees are exempt

Submissions/Arguments

Fees should not be payable under Rule 49 if conditions of Rule 48(2) are met. The opposing party argued for the applicability of fees regardless of the conditions.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the language of Rules 48 and 49 clearly delineates the conditions under which fees are not applicable, emphasizing the importance of compliance with the specified requirements for exemption.

Judgment Excerpts

The parties are agreed that the provisions of Rule 49 are not attracted and no fees are payable under it at the stage of entry into a market area if the agricultural produce in question is covered by sub-rule(2) of Rule 48. Held that Rule 49 will have no application to any case which falls within the ambit of sub-rule (2) of Rule 48.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against the judgment and order of the Gujarat High Court dated 30-10-1974/1-11-1974 in Special Civil Application No. 766/71.

Acts & Sections

  • Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Rules: Rule 48, Rule 49
  • Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Act: Section 6
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Reviews Constitutional Validity of Telephone Tapping in Public Interest Litigation. Right to Privacy under Article 21 Recognized as Fundamental; Procedural Safeguards Required to Prevent Arbitrary Interception under Section 5(2) Indian ...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Lecturer Appointment — No Compliance with Reservation Rules.