Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal for Non-Conformity with Legal Requirements. Certificate Issued Lacked Specification of Substantial Question of Law Under Article 133(1)(a) and (c).

  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from an appeal filed by Express Newspapers Ltd. against the State of Madras, concerning the issuance of a certificate under Article 133(1)(a) and (c) of the Constitution of India. The Supreme Court examined whether the certificate conformed to legal requirements, specifically whether it specified a substantial question of law and provided reasons for its issuance. The court found that the certificate failed to meet these criteria, as it did not specify the substantial question of law that required determination and lacked any supporting reasons. Consequently, the court considered the preliminary objection raised regarding the validity of the certificate. The court noted that if a substantial question of law had been identified, it could have treated the appeal as one by special leave after condoning the delay. However, upon reviewing the judgment, the court concluded that no such question was present. Therefore, the Supreme Court revoked the certificate granted by the High Court, dismissed the appeal, and made no order as to costs. The decision underscored the importance of adhering to procedural requirements in the issuance of certificates under Article 133. The court's ruling emphasized that without a substantial question of law, the appeal could not proceed.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Revocation of Certificate - Non-Conformity with Legal Requirements - Constitution of India, Article 133(1)(a) and (c) - The certificate issued by the High Court did not specify the substantial question of law requiring determination and lacked supporting reasons, thus it could be revoked. The court held that in the absence of a substantial question of law, special leave could not be granted. (Paras 948-949)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Supreme Court could revoke a certificate issued under Article 133(1)(a) and (c) of the Constitution and grant special leave thereafter.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court revoked the certificate granted by the High Court, dismissed the appeal, and made no order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Constitutional law
  • Article 133
  • revocation of certificate
  • special leave
  • substantial question of law
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1981 LawText (SC) (02) 16

Civil Appeal No. 322 of 1970

1981-02-19

Koshal, A.D., Misra, R.B.

1981 AIR 968, 1981 SCR (2) 948, 1981 SCC (2) 479, 1981 SCALE (1) 390

U.R. Lalit, P.H. Parekh, Miss Manik Tarkunde

Express Newspapers Ltd.

The State of Madras

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal concerning the issuance of a certificate under Article 133 of the Constitution.

Remedy Sought

Express Newspapers Ltd. sought to challenge the certificate issued by the High Court.

Filing Reason

The appeal was filed to contest the validity of the certificate issued under Article 133.

Previous Decisions

The High Court's issuance of the certificate was contested for not conforming to legal requirements.

Issues

Validity of the certificate issued under Article 133 Possibility of granting special leave after revocation of the certificate

Submissions/Arguments

The certificate did not specify a substantial question of law Request to treat the appeal as one by special leave after condoning the delay

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that a certificate issued under Article 133 must specify a substantial question of law and provide reasons; failure to do so justifies revocation and denial of special leave.

Judgment Excerpts

the certificate could be revoked no such question is involved at all

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against the judgment and decree dated 25-3-1969 of the Madras High Court in Appeal No. 1195 of 1970.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 133(1)(a), Article 133(1)(c)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Council's Appeal Against Decree in Terms of Arbitral Award in Octroi Collection Dispute. Court Holds That Objections Under Section 30 of Arbitration Act, 1940 Cannot Be Raised After Award Is Made Rule of Court.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Electricity Surcharge Imposition Due to Excess Drawal. Legal Authority Affirmed for Surcharge Under Section 22-B of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910.