Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeal in Murder Case — Conviction Reduced to Culpable Homicide. The court found that the appellant did not share the common intention to commit murder but was guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304, Part 1 of the Indian Penal Code.

In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved the appellant and two others charged with the murder of Gokaran Prasad on 24.11.1975. Initially, the Trial Court acquitted all accused due to insufficient evidence. However, the High Court reversed this decision, convicting the appellant and one other under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and sentencing them to life imprisonment. The appellant's role was limited to pressing down the victim while the others inflicted fatal blows. The Supreme Court analyzed the evidence, particularly the testimonies of eyewitnesses and the nature of injuries sustained by the victim. It noted that the appellant was a school student and lacked the intention to commit murder. The court found that the injuries were inconsistent with a shared intention to kill, leading to the conclusion that the appellant only shared the intention of culpable homicide. Consequently, the Supreme Court set aside the conviction under Section 302 and imposed a ten-year sentence under Section 304, Part 1 of the IPC, allowing the appeal in part.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Common Intention - Evaluation of Intention - Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 34, 302, 304 - The court held that the appellant, by merely pressing down the victim, did not share the common intention of committing murder but rather culpable homicide not amounting to murder. The evidence indicated that the appellant did not inflict any fatal blows, and thus his conviction under Section 302 was set aside, leading to a conviction under Section 304, Part 1 (Paras 588-G).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant shared the common intention to commit murder or culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court set aside the conviction under Section 302 and the life sentence, convicting the appellant under Section 304, Part 1, and sentencing him to ten years of rigorous imprisonment.

Law Points

  • Common intention
  • culpable homicide
  • murder
  • evidence evaluation
  • eyewitness credibility
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1993 LawText (SC) (05) 14

Criminal Appeal No. 618 of 1985

1993-05-05

N.P. Singh, A.S. Anand

1993 SCR (3) 582, 1993 SCC Supl. (4) 218, JT 1993 (3) 470, 1993 SCALE (2) 789

R.L. Kohli, C.P. Lal, S.P. Pandey, A.S. Pundir

Ram Asrey

State of Uttar Pradesh

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to overturn the conviction and sentence.

Filing Reason

Appeal against the High Court's conviction and sentence.

Previous Decisions

Trial Court acquitted the accused; High Court convicted the appellant and one other.

Issues

Whether the appellant shared the common intention to commit murder Whether the evidence supported a conviction under Section 304 instead of Section 302

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the Trial Court rightly disbelieved the eyewitnesses due to inconsistencies. The prosecution maintained that the evidence was sufficient to prove the appellant's involvement.

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that the appellant's actions did not constitute murder as he did not share the common intention to kill, leading to a conviction for culpable homicide instead.

Judgment Excerpts

The High Court has rightly pointed out that PW-6 was not connected with the prosecution party in any manner and there was no reason for him to depose falsely. The appellant was a school student and there was no reason on his part to share the common intention of committing the murder of the victim.

Procedural History

The Trial Court acquitted the accused; the State appealed to the High Court, which convicted the appellant and one other; the appellant then appealed to the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code: 34, 302, 304
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused Under Section 304 Part I for Causing Deaths in Property Dispute — High Court's Reversal of Acquittal Upheld as Evidence of Injured Witnesses Was Credible and Unexplained Injuries on Accused Did Not Discre...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Electricity Regulatory Dispute Over Coal Procurement Compensation. The Court upheld the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity's methodology for calculating compensation for coal shortfall, finding it consistent with est...