Supreme Court Allows Visually Handicapped to Compete in Civil Services Examination — Upholds Right to Write in Braille or with Scribe. The court recognized the necessity for visually handicapped individuals to participate in civil services and directed the government to allow them to write examinations in Braille or with a scribe.

In Favour of Prosecution
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The National Federation of Blind filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, seeking permission for visually handicapped candidates to compete for the Indian Administrative Service and Allied Services, and to write the civil services examination in Braille or with the help of a scribe. The petition arose from the government's failure to implement a memorandum issued in 1986, which identified suitable posts for visually handicapped individuals and recommended preferential treatment in recruitment. The court noted that the visually handicapped constitute a significant section of society and emphasized the need for their inclusion in civil services. The Ministry of Welfare had previously undertaken measures to utilize their potential, including a 3% reservation in Group C and D posts. The court found that the government had identified 416 suitable posts for the visually handicapped but had not implemented the decisions for seven years. The petitioner argued that the memorandum had not been acted upon, and the court acknowledged the counsel's effective representation despite his visual handicap, demonstrating that visually handicapped persons can perform jobs with equal efficiency. The court held that the government should decide on providing preference/reservation for the handicapped in Group A and B posts. It also clarified that visually handicapped candidates should be allowed to compete in civil services examinations, as there were identified posts suitable for them. The court directed the government and the Union Public Service Commission to permit visually handicapped candidates to write the examination in Braille or with a scribe, while also stating that once recruited, they would not have a right to claim promotions to higher posts deemed unsuitable for them. The petition was partly allowed with no orders as to costs.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Right to Compete - Visually handicapped persons' right to compete for civil services - Article 32 of the Constitution of India - The court recognized the necessity for visually handicapped individuals to participate in civil services and directed the government to allow them to write examinations in Braille or with a scribe. Held that their demand is legally justified as they can perform jobs with equal efficiency (Paras 564-566).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether visually handicapped persons have the right to compete for civil services and the justification for writing the examination in Braille or with the help of a scribe.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court partly allowed the writ petition, directing the government and UPSC to permit visually handicapped candidates to compete and write civil services examinations in Braille or with a scribe.

Law Points

  • Right to compete
  • Writ of mandamus
  • Equal efficiency
  • Reservation policy
  • Identification of jobs
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1993 LawText (SC) (03) 50

Writ Petition (C) No. 655 of 1991

1993-03-23

Kuldip Singh, N.M. Kasliwal

1993 AIR 1916, 1993 SCR (2) 556, 1993 SCC (2) 411, JT 1993 (2) 541, 1993 SCALE (2) 181

Santosh Kumar Rungta, R.P. Gupta, V.C. Mahajan, Ms. Niranjana Singh, Ms. A. Subhashini

National Federation of Blind

Union Public Service Commission and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking permission for visually handicapped candidates to compete in civil services examinations.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing the Union of India and UPSC to allow blind candidates to write civil services examinations in Braille or with a scribe.

Filing Reason

Failure of the government to implement a memorandum identifying suitable posts for visually handicapped individuals.

Previous Decisions

The government had issued a memorandum in 1986 regarding the identification of jobs for the handicapped, which had not been implemented.

Issues

Right of visually handicapped to compete in civil services Justification for writing examinations in Braille or with a scribe

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued for the right to compete and write exams in Braille or with a scribe due to identified suitable posts. Respondents contended that the decision on preference for handicapped in recruitment was for the government to decide.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the equal efficiency of visually handicapped individuals in performing jobs and recognized their right to compete for civil services, directing the government to implement preferential treatment in recruitment.

Judgment Excerpts

The performance of the counsel for the petitioner... has amply proved the point that the visually handicapped persons can perform the jobs entrusted to them with equal efficiency. We commend the Government of India to decide the question of providing preference/reservation to the handicapped in Group A and B posts as expeditiously as possible.

Procedural History

The petition was filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus. The case was heard by the Supreme Court, which examined the government's failure to implement prior decisions regarding the recruitment of visually handicapped individuals.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 32
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Goa Tax on Entry of Goods Act, 2000 Against Challenge Based on Legislative Competence and Discrimination. Non-Discriminatory Entry Tax Held Not to Violate Article 301 or 304(a) of Constitution and ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Convict in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Consent — Conviction Under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Absence of Consent Beyond Reasonable Doubt