Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Right to Personal Examination in Criminal Proceedings — Clarifies Scope of Section 313, Cr. P.C.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a criminal complaint filed by the appellant, whose daughter had married the respondent and subsequently committed suicide, leaving their child in the appellant's custody. The respondent forcibly took the child to the U.S.A., leading the appellant to seek legal guardianship and file a kidnapping complaint. The trial court allowed the respondent to be represented by his Advocate during examination under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which the appellant contested, arguing for the respondent's personal appearance. The Supreme Court examined the provisions of Section 313(1), which mandates the personal examination of the accused in warrant cases. The court noted that the right to make a statement under this section is personal to the accused and cannot be delegated to an Advocate. The court referred to previous judgments that reinforced this principle, ultimately setting aside the Magistrate's order and directing that the respondent be personally examined. The court emphasized the importance of the accused's opportunity to explain circumstances against him, particularly in light of the ongoing prosecution. The appeal was disposed of with directions for immediate action by the Magistrate.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Examination of Accused - Personal Examination Requirement - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Section 313(1) - The court held that the examination of the accused under Section 313(1)(b) is mandatory in warrant cases, and cannot be substituted by the examination of the accused's Advocate. The court emphasized the necessity of personal examination to allow the accused to explain incriminating circumstances against him (Paras 472-474).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the trial Magistrate was legally right in examining the Advocate of the accused in his place in a warrant case under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court set aside the Magistrate's order allowing examination of the Advocate and directed that the respondent be personally examined under Section 313(1)(b) of the Code.

Law Points

  • Examination of accused
  • Section 313 Cr. P.C.
  • Personal attendance
  • Warrant case
  • Rights of accused
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1993 LawText (SC) (04) 23

Criminal Appeal No. 398 of 1993

1993-04-30

A.M. Ahmadi, S. Mohan

1993 AIR 2090, 1993 SCR (3) 467, 1993 SCC (3) 208, JT 1993 (3) 254, 1993 SCALE (2) 734

K.K. Venugopal, L.K. Pandey, S. Anand, D.P. Gupta, A. Subhashni

Usha K. Pillai

Raj. K. Srinivas and Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal regarding the examination of the accused in a kidnapping case.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought the personal appearance of the respondent for examination under Section 313.

Filing Reason

The respondent forcibly took the appellant's granddaughter to the U.S.A.

Previous Decisions

The trial court allowed the respondent's Advocate to be examined instead of the respondent.

Issues

Whether the trial Magistrate was correct in allowing the examination of the Advocate instead of the accused under Section 313.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued for the necessity of the respondent's personal examination under Section 313. The respondent's Advocate contended that representation was sufficient.

Ratio Decidendi

The examination of the accused under Section 313(1)(b) is mandatory in warrant cases, and cannot be substituted by the examination of an Advocate.

Judgment Excerpts

The examination of a lawyer would not be sufficient compliance with the mandate of the said provision. The privilege of making a statement under Section 342 of the old code is personal to the accused.

Procedural History

The appellant filed a complaint of kidnapping, the trial court allowed the respondent's Advocate to be examined, and the appellant appealed against this decision.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Section 313
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Teachers Against Private School Management — No Statutory Basis for Salary Claims. Citing absence of statutory provisions, the court ruled that private educational institutions are not bound to implement pay commis...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Workmen's Challenge to Forced Retirement at 55 for Pre-Standing Order Employees in Industrial Dispute. Standing Order Fixing Retirement Age at 55 Was Held Inapplicable to Employees Recruited Before Certification, and Their Super...