Headnote
A) Criminal Law - Jurisdiction of Designated Court - Conviction under TADA Act - Appellant was rightly tried by the Designated Court under the provisions of the T.A.D.A Act, 1987. - Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987, Sections 5, 12 - The court upheld the jurisdiction of the Designated Court to try the appellant for the offence under T.A.D.A Act, 1987, as the prosecution had considered it a fit case for trial under the Act. Held that the appellant was rightly tried under T.A.D.A. (Paras 59-60). B) Criminal Law - Interpretation of Statutes - Conjunctive reading of arms and ammunition - The words
Subscribe to unlock Headnote
Subscribe Now
Issue of Consideration
Whether the appellant was rightly convicted under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 and whether the sentence imposed was appropriate.
Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration
Subscribe Now
Law Points
- Conviction under TADA Act
- Jurisdiction of Designated Court
- Interpretation of Arms Act
- Conjunctive reading of arms and ammunition
- Evidence credibility
Subscribe to unlock Law Points
Subscribe Now
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Additional Charge Under Section 304-B IPC Against Husband and Mother-in-Law in Dowry Death Case. Absence of Evidence of Demand of Dowry 'Soon Before Death' and Lack of Proximate Link Between Cruelty and Suicide Precludes Fra...
2026-10-12 23:50:28
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Employer in Industrial Dispute Case — Res Judicata Applies to Employment Status.
2026-10-12 23:50:24
