Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition for Migration from Non-Recognised Medical College Due to Lack of Inherent Right. Eligibility Criteria for Migration Established by Medical Council of India Upheld as Reasonable and Not Arbitrary.

  • 8
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved the right of students admitted to non-recognised medical colleges to claim migration to recognised medical colleges after passing the first MBBS examination. The petitioner, Shirish Govind Prabhudesai, sought transfer from Bhausaheb Hire Government Medical College, Dhule, to B.J. Medical College, Pune, after his request was denied by the Director of Medical Education & Research, citing the condition that only students from recognised colleges could transfer. The court examined the eligibility criteria for migration as prescribed by the Medical Council of India, which aimed to maintain educational standards and prevent indirect entry into recognised colleges. The court found that the differentiation between students from recognised and non-recognised colleges was not arbitrary but based on objective standards of medical education. The court dismissed the writ petition and special leave petition, affirming that there is no inherent right for students from non-recognised colleges to claim migration. However, it allowed two other students, Rajendra S. Sankpal and Riaz Nomani, to retain their transfers to Grant Medical College, Bombay, as they had already completed their MBBS degrees there, emphasizing that reversing their transfers would not benefit other students and would unjustly deprive them of their earned qualifications. The court directed the High Court to dispose of pending writ petitions accordingly, without setting a precedent.

Headnote

A) Education Law - Migration of Students - Right to Migration - Constitution of India, 1950, Article 14 - The court held that students from non-recognised medical colleges do not have an inherent right to migrate to recognised medical colleges, as the eligibility criteria set by the Medical Council of India are reasonable and not arbitrary. The differentiation between students of recognised and non-recognised colleges is justified based on the qualitative standards of medical education (Paras 106-107).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether students from non-recognised medical colleges have a right to migrate to recognised medical colleges after passing the first MBBS examination.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the writ petition and special leave petition, affirming that students from non-recognised medical colleges do not have an inherent right to migrate to recognised medical colleges. The court upheld the eligibility criteria set by the Medical Council of India as reasonable and justified.

Law Points

  • Migration of students
  • eligibility criteria
  • discrimination
  • Medical Council of India recommendations
  • constitutional validity
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1992 LawText (SC) (10) 8

Writ Petition (C) No. 351 of 1992

1992-10-21

J.S. Verma, Yogeshwar Dayal, N. Venkatachala

H.N. Salve, V.A. Bobde, V.N. Ganpule, D.N. Mishra, A.S. Bhasme, Mrs. K. Hingorani, Vikas Singh, L.R. Singh, Dhurv Mehta, S.K. Mehta

Shirish Govind Prabhudesai

State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the refusal of migration from a non-recognised medical college to a recognised medical college.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought permission for transfer to B.J. Medical College, Pune.

Filing Reason

Refusal of transfer by the Director of Medical Education & Research based on eligibility criteria.

Previous Decisions

High Court dismissed similar petitions, upholding the eligibility criteria set by the Medical Council of India.

Issues

Whether the eligibility criteria for migration from non-recognised to recognised medical colleges are discriminatory. Whether students from non-recognised medical colleges have a right to migrate to recognised medical colleges.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the differentiation between students of recognised and non-recognised colleges is arbitrary. Respondent contended that the eligibility criteria are based on objective standards and are necessary to maintain educational quality.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the eligibility criteria for migration from non-recognised to recognised medical colleges, as established by the Medical Council of India, are reasonable and not arbitrary, ensuring the maintenance of educational standards.

Judgment Excerpts

The court held that students from non-recognised medical colleges do not have an inherent right to migrate to recognised medical colleges. The differentiation between students of recognised and non-recognised colleges is justified based on the qualitative standards of medical education.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution after the refusal of transfer by the Director of Medical Education & Research. The High Court dismissed similar petitions, leading to the special leave petition being filed.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Medical Council Act:
  • Constitution of India: Article 14
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Sets Aside Regularization of Employees in Public Sector Undertaking Due to Non-Compliance with Recruitment Rules. Appointments Made Without Following Proper Procedures Declared Nullities Under Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Withdrawal of School Recognition for Shifting Without Permission — Directs Reconsideration of Approval for Teachers and Grant-in-Aid. The court held that the shifting was necessitated by building c...