Case Note & Summary
The judgment involved a procedural hearing where Mr. Gobinda Mukhoty, learned counsel for the petitioner, commenced his arguments at 2:00 p.m. and concluded at 3:40 p.m. Following this, Mr. O.P. Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent, began his arguments but did not conclude by the time the court rose for the day at 4:00 p.m. The court scheduled the matter for further hearing on 7-12-1992 at 2:00 p.m.
Issue of Consideration
12280
Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration
Subscribe Now
Final Decision
The court scheduled the matter for further hearing on 7-12-1992 at 2:00 p.m.
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Specific Performance Suit — Unregistered Agreement for Sale Can Confer Lawful Possession Entitled to Injunctive Protection. The Court held that possession under an unregistered agreement for sale is lawful ...
2026-10-12 01:36:51
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Sets Aside NCLT and NCLAT Orders in Insolvency Matter Due to Reliance on AI-Hallucinated Precedents. The Court held that judgments based on non-existent, AI-generated fake material cannot be sustained and reaffirmed the necessity of hum...
2026-10-12 01:36:51
