Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Tender Dispute Over Earnest Money Payment. Tender Condition Waiver Permitted as Technical Irregularity Found Insignificant.

In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a tender process initiated by the Diesel Locomotive Works, Indian Railways, for the disposal of Ferrous scrap. The appellant submitted a tender with a cheque from the Union Bank of India, while the tender notice required earnest money to be deposited via cash or a demand draft from the State Bank of India. The appellant's tender was accepted as the highest bid, leading to a challenge from respondent no. 1, whose tender was rejected for not depositing earnest money. The High Court ruled that the appellant's tender was invalid due to non-compliance with the payment condition. The appellant contended that the cheque was certified and verified, thus substantially complying with the requirement. The Supreme Court analyzed the nature of tender conditions, distinguishing between essential and ancillary requirements. It concluded that the Diesel Locomotive Works had the authority to waive the technical non-compliance, especially since the Tender Committee had verified the cheque's authenticity. The court set aside the High Court's judgment, allowing the appeal and dismissing the writ petition filed by respondent no. 1, thereby affirming the acceptance of the appellant's tender.

Headnote

A) Tender Law - Compliance with Tender Conditions - Waiver of Technical Irregularities - Constitution of India, Articles 226 and 136 - The court held that an authority inviting tenders is not bound to enforce every term in meticulous detail and may waive minor technical irregularities. The appellant's tender was accepted despite the cheque being from a different bank, as the Tender Committee verified its authenticity, thus allowing for a waiver of strict compliance (Paras 1-8).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the acceptance of the appellant's tender was valid despite the payment being made via a cheque from a bank other than the one specified in the tender notice.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's judgment, and dismissed the writ petition filed by the respondent, affirming the acceptance of the appellant's tender.

Law Points

  • Tender conditions
  • waiver of technical irregularities
  • compliance with tender requirements
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1991 LawText (SC) (05) 11

Civil Appeal No. 2272 of 1991

1991-05-06

L.M. Sharma, M.M. Punchhi

1991 AIR 1579, 1991 SCR (2) 696, 1991 SCC (3) 273, JT 1991 (2) 577, 1991 SCALE (1) 928

Sunil Gupta, S. Sukumaran, Dr. Anand Prakash, B.K. Prasad, S.N. Sikka

Poddar Steel Corporation

Ganesh Engineering Works and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Dispute over the acceptance of a tender and compliance with payment conditions.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to uphold the acceptance of its tender.

Filing Reason

Respondent challenged the acceptance of the appellant's tender due to alleged non-compliance with payment conditions.

Previous Decisions

High Court ruled in favor of the respondent, stating the appellant's tender was invalid.

Issues

Whether the acceptance of the appellant's tender was valid despite the payment being made via a cheque from a bank other than the one specified in the tender notice. Whether the authority had the power to waive the technical non-compliance with the tender conditions.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the cheque was certified and verified, thus substantially complying with the requirement. Respondent contended that the appellant's tender was invalid due to non-compliance with the payment condition.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that not every term in a tender notice must be enforced rigidly, allowing for waivers of minor technical irregularities when the authority has verified compliance.

Judgment Excerpts

As a matter of general proposition it cannot be laid down that an authority inviting tenders is bound to give effect to every term mentioned in the notice in meticulous detail. In the instant case, the certified cheque of the Union Bank of India drawn on its own branch must be treated as sufficient for the purpose of achieving the object of the condition.

Procedural History

The appellant's tender was accepted after verification, leading to a writ petition by the respondent in the High Court, which ruled against the appellant, prompting the appeal to the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 136
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Convictions of GREF Personnel Under Army Act for Disciplinary Violations — Validity of Section 21 Affirmed.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Detention Order Under Preventive Detention Act — No Violation of Rights Established. The court upheld the legality of the detention order under the Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Boot-Leggers,...