Supreme Court Dismisses Petition for Equal Pay by Grih Kalyan Kendra Workers’ Union — No Comparable Employment Established.

  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by the Grih Kalyan Kendra Workers’ Union, seeking a declaration that the Grih Kalyan Kendra is a 'State' under Article 12 of the Constitution of India and demanding equal pay for equal work compared to employees of the Union of India and other departments. The Kendra, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1960, aimed to assist lower-income government servants by providing opportunities for their dependents to gain skills and work experience. The employees were categorized into regular staff on deputation and ad-hoc employees paid honorarium or piece rates without benefits. The Union contested the claims, asserting that the Kendra's employees were not regular and their duties were not comparable to those of other government employees. The Supreme Court dismissed the petition, concluding that the Kendra's employees were not situated similarly to those in other government departments, thus the principle of equal pay for equal work was not violated. The Court emphasized that the Kendra's unique employment nature precluded a valid comparison with other government entities. The petitioners' claims for pension, gratuity, and provident fund were also rejected. The Court noted that previous findings by a former Chief Justice had established that no discrimination existed, and the petitioners could not reopen the matter. The petition was dismissed without costs.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Definition of 'State' - Grih Kalyan Kendra's status - The Court held that Grih Kalyan Kendra is not comparable to other government entities, thus not violating equal pay principles - Constitution of India, 1950, Article 12 - The Kendra's unique nature and lack of comparable employment led to the conclusion that equal pay for equal work was not applicable (Paras 27E, 28A-B).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether Grih Kalyan Kendra is a 'State' under Article 12 and entitled to provide equal pay for equal work.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the writ petition, concluding that the employees of Grih Kalyan Kendra were not similarly situated to those in other government departments, thus the principle of equal pay for equal work was not violated. The claims for pension, gratuity, and provident fund were also rejected.

Law Points

  • equal pay for equal work
  • Article 12
  • Article 14
  • Article 16
  • Societies Registration Act
  • 1960
  • constitutional obligation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1991 LawText (SC) (01) 18

Writ Petition No. 869 of 1988

1991-01-09

K.N. Singh, N.D. Ojha

1991 AIR 1173, 1991 SCR (1) 15, 1991 SCC (1) 619, JT 1991 (1) 60, 1991 SCALE (1) 1

Govind Mukhoty, Naresh Kaushik, Ms. Lalitha Kaushik, V.C. Mahajan, Girish Chandra, Ms. A. Subhashini

Grih Kalyan Kendra Workers’ Union

Union of India and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India.

Remedy Sought

Declaration of Grih Kalyan Kendra as 'State' and issuance of a writ of mandamus for equal pay.

Filing Reason

Claim for equal pay for equal work and benefits like pension and gratuity.

Previous Decisions

Earlier writ petition regarding similar claims was disposed of based on findings of no comparable employment.

Issues

Whether Grih Kalyan Kendra is a 'State' under Article 12 Whether the principle of equal pay for equal work applies to Kendra employees

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued for equal pay based on comparable work with NDMC employees. Respondents contended that Kendra employees are not comparable to other government employees.

Ratio Decidendi

The principle of equal pay for equal work does not apply where there is no reasonable similarity in the nature of work performed by employees of different organizations.

Judgment Excerpts

There being no other Government or semi-Government employees who can be regarded, even broadly, as being situated similarly as the employees of the Kendra, the principle of equal pay for equal work cannot be said to be violated by the payment of mere honorarium to these employees. The findings recorded by the Former Chief Justice clearly show that there has been no discrimination as the petitioners are not being discriminated from those who are situated equally.

Procedural History

The petition was filed under Article 32 of the Constitution. An earlier writ petition was disposed of based on findings by a former Chief Justice regarding the unique employment nature of Kendra employees.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 12, 14, 16
  • Societies Registration Act:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Customs Act Case Regarding Palm Kernel Import. The court found that Palm Kernel was not a canalised item and thus could be imported without a licence prior to the specified date.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds BIADA's Right to Recover Unearned Increase Based on Circle Rate in Industrial Land Transfers. Authority Entitled to Fair Share of Appreciation When Allottee Transfers Leasehold Rights for Commercial Gain.