Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Removal from Cooperative Society Board — Jurisdictional Issues Addressed. The court upheld the removal of a director for defaulting on loan repayments under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from the removal of the appellant from the Board of Directors of the District Central Co-operative Bank, Chandrapur, Maharashtra, following allegations of default in loan repayments. The appellant was elected on 18.08.1986, but by 08.01.1987, he was issued a notice under Section 78(1) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, for being in arrears on his loan. Despite repaying the dues on 21.10.1986, the authorities maintained that he was disqualified due to his default at the time of election. The appellant contended that the removal was without jurisdiction as the election procedure was not followed, and he was not a defaulter at the time of the notice. The court analyzed the provisions of the Act, particularly Section 73FF, which stipulates disqualification for defaulters, and concluded that the appellant's default persisted until repayment, thus validating his removal. The court emphasized that the notice did not set aside the election but addressed the appellant's disqualification to continue as a director. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the removal order and highlighting the importance of compliance with statutory provisions regarding disqualification (Paras 676-685).

Headnote

A) Cooperative Societies Law - Disqualification for Membership - Default in Loan Repayment - Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, Section 73FF - The appellant was disqualified from being a member of the committee due to default in loan repayment, which continued until the dues were cleared. The court held that the appellant's default persisted from the date of his election until repayment, thus justifying his removal from the Board (Paras 682-684).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the removal of the appellant from the Board of Directors was justified under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the removal of the appellant from the Board of Directors for being a defaulter under Section 73FF of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The court held that the appellant's default persisted from the date of his election until repayment, justifying the removal order.

Law Points

  • Disqualification of committee members
  • Default in loan repayment
  • Removal from office
  • Election procedure
  • Interpretation of statutes
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1991 LawText (SC) (02) 26

Civil Appeal No. 4974 of 1990

1991-02-22

K.N. Saikia, M.M. Punchhi

1991 SCR (1) 675, 1991 SCC (2) 423, JT 1991 (1) 576, 1991 SCALE (1) 299

G.L. Sanghi, Mrs. Jayshree Wad, Dhruv Mehta, Ms. Tamali Das Gupta, S.V. Deshpande, V.N. Patil, A. S. Bhasme

Pundalik

District Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Chandrapur

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against removal from the Board of Directors of a cooperative bank.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to overturn the removal order.

Filing Reason

The appellant was removed for defaulting on loan repayments.

Previous Decisions

The High Court dismissed the appellant's writ petition challenging the removal.

Issues

Whether the removal was justified under the Act. Whether the appellant was a defaulter at the time of election.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the removal was without jurisdiction as the election procedure was not followed. The respondent contended that the disqualification continued after the election due to default.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that a member who incurs disqualification due to default ceases to be a member of the committee, and the removal order was valid as the appellant was a defaulter at the time of his election.

Judgment Excerpts

The day an instalment falls due on its due date, failure to pay results in default and this default continues day after day until it is repaid. The moment the appellant after election continued to be in default... stood disqualified and thereby ceased to be a member of the Committee.

Procedural History

The appellant was elected on 18.08.1986, received a notice on 08.01.1987 for removal due to default, was removed on 07.12.1987, and subsequent appeals and revisions were dismissed before reaching the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960: Section 73FF, Section 78(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Tax Case — ITAT Correctly Quashed Commissioner's Revisional Order Under Section 263 of Income Tax Act. The Court Held That the Assessing Officer's Order Was Not Erroneous or Prejudicial to R...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Contempt Conviction and Directs Reimbursement of Defrauded Purchasers in Delhi Development Authority Land Auction Dispute. DDA's Re-entry Following Builder's Default and Court Order Violations Affirmed Under Contract Terms and C...