Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Divorce by Mutual Consent Case — Unilateral Withdrawal of Consent Invalidates Decree.

In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a petition for divorce by mutual consent filed by the appellant-wife and respondent-husband under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. After their statements were recorded, the wife later sought to withdraw her consent, claiming it was obtained under pressure. The District Judge initially dismissed the petition, but the High Court reversed this decision, granting a decree of divorce based on the premise that consent once given could not be unilaterally withdrawn. The Supreme Court analyzed Section 13-B, emphasizing that the filing of the petition does not itself dissolve the marriage; a joint motion is required for the court to proceed. The court noted that the waiting period of 6 to 18 months allows parties to reconsider their decision, and if one party withdraws consent during this time, the court cannot grant a divorce. The court affirmed that mutual consent must persist until the decree is finalized, overruling previous High Court decisions that suggested otherwise. Ultimately, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the divorce decree and emphasizing the importance of mutual consent in divorce proceedings.

Headnote

A) Family Law - Divorce by Mutual Consent - Unilateral Withdrawal of Consent - Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 13-B - The court held that mutual consent is a prerequisite for passing a decree of divorce, and one party cannot unilaterally withdraw consent after filing the petition. The requirement for a joint motion under Section 13-B(2) ensures that both parties must agree until the decree is passed, affirming the necessity of mutual consent throughout the process. (Paras 275-282).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a party to a petition for divorce by mutual consent under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act can unilaterally withdraw consent before the decree is passed.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the decree for dissolution of marriage, and emphasized that mutual consent must continue until the decree is passed.

Law Points

  • Divorce by mutual consent
  • Unilateral withdrawal of consent
  • Joint motion requirement
  • Section 13-B Hindu Marriage Act
  • 1955
  • Jurisdiction of the court in divorce cases
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1991 LawText (SC) (02) 13

Civil Appeal No. 633 of 1991

1991-02-07

K. Jagannatha Shetty, S.C. Agrawal

1992 AIR 1904, 1991 SCR (1) 274, 1991 SCC (2) 25, JT 1991 (1) 321, 1991 SCALE (1) 156

Dhruv Mehta, Aman Vachher, S.K. Mehta, Subhagmal Jain, H.K. Puri

Smt. Sureshta Devi

Om Prakash

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Petition for divorce by mutual consent under the Hindu Marriage Act.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to dismiss the divorce petition.

Filing Reason

The appellant claimed her consent was obtained under pressure.

Previous Decisions

The District Judge dismissed the petition, but the High Court reversed this decision.

Issues

Whether unilateral withdrawal of consent is permissible in mutual consent divorce. The implications of mutual consent on the jurisdiction of the court.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that her consent was obtained under threat and pressure. The respondent contended that the consent was valid and could not be withdrawn unilaterally.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that mutual consent is essential for a divorce decree under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, and one party cannot unilaterally withdraw consent once given.

Judgment Excerpts

The filing of the petition under section 13-B(1) with mutual consent does not authorise the Court to make a decree for divorce. Mutual consent to the divorce is a sine qua non for passing a decree for divorce under section 13-B. If one of the parties at that stage withdraws its consent the Court cannot pass a decree of divorce by mutual consent.

Procedural History

The appellant and respondent filed a petition for divorce by mutual consent. The District Judge dismissed the petition, which was reversed by the High Court, granting a decree of divorce. The Supreme Court then heard the appeal.

Acts & Sections

  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: 13-B, 23(1)(bb)
  • Special Marriage Act, 1954: 28
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Crew's Right to Wages Despite Vessel Confiscation — Maritime Liens Recognized.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Return to Paper Ballots or 100% VVPAT Counting in Elections. Court Upholds EVMs with VVPAT as Sufficiently Transparent and Reliable, Rejects Allegations of Manipulation Without Evidence.