Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Cooperative Societies Dispute — Arbitration Validated. The court found that the dispute regarding irregularities in the purchase of building materials fell under Section 60 of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 1972, justifying the arbitration process.

  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from allegations of irregularities in the purchase of building materials by the previous Managing Committee of a Cooperative Housing Society, where the appellant served as President. Following a complaint from the new Managing Committee, the Registrar of Cooperative Societies referred the matter to arbitration. The Arbitrator issued an ex-parte award against the appellant for failing to respond to the claims. The appellant's subsequent appeal to the Delhi Cooperative Tribunal was dismissed, affirming the Arbitrator's decision. The appellant then filed a writ petition in the High Court, which was also dismissed. The core legal issue was whether the dispute fell under Section 59 or Section 60 of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 1972. The appellant contended that Section 59, which deals with surcharge, was applicable, while the respondents argued for Section 60, which pertains to arbitration. The Supreme Court analyzed the provisions of both sections and concluded that the dispute indeed related to the management of the society, thus justifying the referral to arbitration under Section 60. The court dismissed the appeal, affirming the lower court's decisions and imposing costs on the appellant.

Headnote

A) Cooperative Societies Law - Dispute Resolution - Scope of Section 60 - Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 1972, Sections 59, 60 - The court held that the dispute regarding irregularities in the purchase of building materials by the previous Managing Committee pertains to the management of the society and thus falls within the ambit of Section 60, allowing for arbitration. The Registrar's referral to arbitration was justified. (Paras 1.1-1.2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the dispute regarding irregularities in the purchase of building materials falls under Section 60 of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 1972.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the decisions of the lower courts and holding that the dispute fell under Section 60 of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 1972, justifying the arbitration process.

Law Points

  • Arbitration
  • Cooperative Societies
  • Dispute Resolution
  • Ex-parte Award
  • Jurisdiction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1991 LawText (SC) (08) 25

Civil Appeal No. 3237 of 1991

1991-08-27

Verma, Jagdish Saran, Sharma, L.M.

1991 AIR 2254, 1991 SCR (3) 782, 1991 SCC Supl. (2) 215, JT 1991 (3) 570, 1991 SCALE (2) 459

Soli J. Sorabjee, S.V. Deshpande, Dr. Y.S. Chitale, S.K. Sinha

Prem Jeet Kumar

Surender Gandotra and Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Dispute regarding irregularities in the purchase of building materials by the previous Managing Committee of a Cooperative Housing Society.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to challenge the ex-parte award and subsequent dismissals of appeals.

Filing Reason

The appellant contended that the dispute should be governed by Section 59 rather than Section 60.

Previous Decisions

The Delhi Cooperative Tribunal and the High Court dismissed the appellant's appeals.

Issues

Whether the dispute regarding irregularities in the purchase of building materials falls under Section 60 of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 1972.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that Section 59, dealing with surcharge, was applicable. The respondents contended that Section 60, relating to arbitration, was applicable.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that disputes related to the management of a cooperative society fall under Section 60 of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 1972, allowing for arbitration.

Judgment Excerpts

The dispute should be referred to the arbitration. The Arbitrator’s act of proceeding ex-parte was justified.

Procedural History

The matter was referred to arbitration by the Registrar, an ex-parte award was issued by the Arbitrator, the appeal to the Delhi Cooperative Tribunal was dismissed, and the High Court also dismissed the writ petition.

Acts & Sections

  • Delhi Cooperative Societies Act: 59, 60
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Teacher Challenging Termination in MEPS Rules Case — Appointment on Year-to-Year Basis Not Confirmed. Probationary teacher's termination upheld as approval was extended only till 30.04.1995 under Schedule B o...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal and Sets Aside Bribery Conviction of Patwari in Prevention of Corruption Act Case. Widow of Deceased Appellant Permitted to Continue Appeal Because Composite Sentence of Imprisonment and Fine Treated as Appeal from Sentenc...