Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Regarding Cooperative Society Membership and Allotment. The notification allowing retrospective effect to the amended bye-law was upheld as valid under Section 88 of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 1972.

  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from the Rehabilitation Ministry Employees Cooperative House Building Society Ltd., which was formed in 1959 to facilitate housing for employees of the Ministry of Rehabilitation. The society faced challenges regarding the allotment of land after a draw of lots held in December 1988, which was contested by the appellants on grounds of seniority and the validity of a notification that retroactively amended the society's bye-laws. The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellants' petition, leading to this appeal. The Supreme Court examined the legality of the notification dated 27th October 1987, which exempted the society from Section 12 of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, allowing the amended bye-law to have retrospective effect from 10th January 1968. The court found that the Lt. Governor acted within his powers and that the retrospective application was justified to regularize long-standing members. The court also addressed the seniority issue, confirming that members whose applications were regularized after the appellants could not claim seniority over them. Ultimately, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the High Court's decision and the validity of the notification.

Headnote

A) Cooperative Societies Law - Retrospective Effect of Bye-Laws - Validity of Notification - Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 1972, Sections 12, 76, 88 - The court upheld the notification allowing retrospective effect to the amended bye-law, stating it was within the powers of the Lt. Governor under Section 88 of the Act. The notification was deemed necessary to regularize members who had been part of the society for many years, ensuring fairness in membership (Paras 849-855).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Validity of retrospective effect of amended bye-law and seniority of members in cooperative society

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the validity of the notification dated 27th October 1987 and confirming the seniority determination made by the High Court.

Law Points

  • Cooperative Society Law
  • Quasi-Judicial Orders
  • Retrospective Effect of Bye-Laws
  • Exemption under Cooperative Societies Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1991 LawText (SC) (08) 21

Civil Appeal No. 3382 of 1991

1991-08-29

K.J. Shetty, S.C. Agrawal

1991 AIR 295, 1990 SCR Supl. (2) 552, 1991 SCC Supl. (2) 421

D.D. Thakur, V.C. Mahajan, N.S. Das Bahl, D.N. Puri, Mukul Mudgal, Ms. A. Subhashini, K. Vasudev, S. Mathur, Syed Ali Ahmad, Syed Tanweer Ahmed, S. Balakrishnan, M.K.D. Nambodiri, P.P. Tripathi, Ms. Sangita Garg

H.C. Suman and Anr.

Rehabilitation Ministry Employees Cooperative House Building Society Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Dispute regarding membership and allotment of land in a cooperative society

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to challenge the validity of the notification and assert seniority in allotment

Filing Reason

Challenged the retrospective effect of the amended bye-law and the seniority of members

Previous Decisions

Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the notification and seniority

Issues

Whether the notification allowing retrospective effect to the amended bye-law is valid Whether the seniority of members was correctly determined

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the retrospective effect of the bye-law was ultra vires and unfair Respondents contended that the notification was necessary to regularize long-standing members

Ratio Decidendi

The Lt. Governor had the authority under Section 88 of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act to issue the notification allowing retrospective effect to the amended bye-law, which was necessary to regularize the membership of long-standing members.

Judgment Excerpts

The notification dated 27th October, 1987 indicates that by its earlier part the Lt. Governor has exempted the society from the provision of Section 12 of the Act. A quasi-judicial order once passed and having become final cannot be reviewed by the authority passing that order unless power of review has been specifically conferred.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed after the Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the notification and the seniority of members in Writ Petition No. 2915 of 1988.

Acts & Sections

  • Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 1972: 12, 76, 88
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Employer's Appeals; Preventive Detention Cannot Substitute for Departmental Enquiry in Termination of Dock Workers. Statutory Authority Must Afford Reasonable Opportunity and Test Evidence Before Terminating Services Under Cal...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Withdrawal of Public Interest Litigation on Children's Rights — Upholds Judicial Accountability.