Supreme Court Issues Interim Directions in Forest Land Eviction Case Due to Lack of Progress. Court Modifies Deposit Requirement and Appoints New Commissioner to Expedite Proceedings Under Section 20 of the Forest Act, 1927.

  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a writ petition filed by the petitioner challenging the eviction of inhabitants from areas declared as reserve forest under Section 20 of the Forest Act, 1927. The Supreme Court had been issuing interim orders and appointing commissioners to oversee the preparation of land records and identification of forest land. The proceedings had been ongoing for nearly nine years without substantial progress, prompting the court to review the situation. During a hearing on July 11, 1991, it was noted that one of the commissioners, Mr. R.P. Pandey, was unable to shift to the site, necessitating his replacement with Shri Prem Singh, a retired District Judge. The court modified the earlier direction for a deposit of Rs.20 lakhs to Rs.5 lakhs, based on assurances of timely fund availability. The Chief Secretary was advised to revive a monitoring committee to facilitate coordinated efforts. The Executive Chairman of the U.P. State Legal Aid and Advice Board was tasked with supervising the work and providing monthly reports to the court. The court directed that an affidavit confirming compliance with the modified directions be filed within three weeks. The matter was scheduled for further review in five weeks.

Headnote

A) Forest Law - Eviction from Reserve Forest - Challenge to Eviction - Forest Act, 1927, Section 20 - The petitioner challenged the eviction of inhabitants from areas declared as reserve forest. The court reviewed the progress of the case and issued interim directions to ensure compliance and effective management of the situation. Held that the process must not be unduly prolonged (Paras 403-404).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the interim directions regarding the management of forest land and the appointment of commissioners were being effectively implemented.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court modified the deposit requirement from Rs.20 lakhs to Rs.5 lakhs, appointed Shri Prem Singh as a new commissioner, and directed the revival of the monitoring committee. The State was ordered to file an affidavit confirming compliance with the modified directions within three weeks.

Law Points

  • Interim orders
  • appointment of commissioners
  • modification of deposit amount
  • revival of monitoring committee
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1991 LawText (SC) (08) 14

Writ Petition (CRL.) No. 1061 of 1982

1991-08-06

Misra, Rangnath (CJ), Kuldip Singh (J)

1991 SCR (3) 402, 1992 SCC (1) 117, JT 1991 (6) 99, 1991 SCALE (2) 261

M.A. Krishna Moorthy, A.S. Pundir, Din Dayal Sharma, Ms. Sangeeta Aggarwal, C.V. Subba Rao, Gopal Subramaniam

Banwasi Seva Ashram

State of U.P.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging eviction from reserve forest areas.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to prevent eviction and ensure proper management of forest land.

Filing Reason

Eviction of inhabitants from areas declared as reserve forest.

Previous Decisions

Interim orders had been issued previously, but no substantial progress was made.

Issues

Effectiveness of interim directions Appointment of new commissioner Modification of deposit amount

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued for the need to prevent eviction and ensure proper management. State assured compliance with directions but requested modification of deposit amount.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the need for timely action and effective management in the proceedings under the Forest Act, 1927, while ensuring that the process does not become unduly prolonged.

Judgment Excerpts

The exercise involved in the process of preparing the records, identification of forest land and final action under the Forest Act, is undoubtedly massive but that by itself would not justify a protracted proceeding. With regard to the direction for depositing Rs.20 lakhs it is modified as Rs.5 lakhs in view of the assurance that more funds can come on requisition without loss of time.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed challenging eviction from reserve forest areas. Interim orders were issued, and commissioners were appointed to oversee the process. The matter was reviewed on July 11, 1991, leading to further directions and modifications.

Acts & Sections

  • Forest Act, 1927: Section 20
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Grants Injunction Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act to Protect Decree-Holder's Interest Pending Execution. Court Restrains Respondents from Alienating Property Subject to Execution Petition to Prevent Frustration of Arbitral Decree...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused Police Officials for Wrongful Confinement and Obstruction of Public Servant Despite Irregular Search. Non-Compliance with Section 165 Cr.P.C. Does Not Grant Right to Assault and Confine Investigating Office...