Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal for Inclusion of Laskar Community in Scheduled Tribes List — Historical Claims Insufficient.

  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from the appellant's claim of belonging to the Laskar community, which he asserted was historically recognized as a Scheduled Tribe in Tripura. The appellant filed a writ petition after the State Government's decision in 1976 to exclude the Laskar community from the Scheduled Tribes list, seeking to restore their status and benefits. The High Court dismissed the petition, leading to this appeal. The Supreme Court noted that while the Laskar community had previously enjoyed Scheduled Tribe benefits, there was no formal inclusion in the Presidential Order under Article 342. The court emphasized that the criteria for inclusion are stringent and require legislative action, not merely historical claims. The court commended the authorities to review the appellant's claim but ultimately dismissed the appeal, stating that historical inclusion does not suffice for current legal recognition. The decision underscored the importance of legislative processes in determining Scheduled Tribe status and the evolving nature of social justice considerations (Paras 581-588).

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Scheduled Tribes Inclusion - Criteria for Inclusion - Constitution of India, 1950, Articles 341 and 342 - The appellant claimed that the Laskar community was historically treated as a Scheduled Tribe but was excluded in 1976. The court held that historical claims alone do not justify inclusion in the Presidential Order, emphasizing the need for a proper legislative process for any modifications (Paras 586-587).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Laskar community should be included in the list of Scheduled Tribes under Article 342 of the Constitution.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, stating that historical claims do not suffice for inclusion in the Scheduled Tribes list under Article 342. The court emphasized the need for legislative action for any modifications to the Presidential Order.

Law Points

  • Scheduled Tribes
  • Presidential Order
  • Article 342
  • inclusion criteria
  • historical evidence
  • reservation policy
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1990 LawText (SC) (02) 60

Civil Appeal No. 479 of 1986

1990-02-23

Ranganath Misra, M.M. Punchhi, S.C. Agrawal

1990 AIR 991, 1990 SCR (1) 576, 1990 SCC Supl. 220, JT 1990 (2) 27, 1990 SCALE (1) 300

A.K. Ganguli, A. Mariarputham, A.D. Sikri, Dilip Tandon, Kapil Sibal, Rajiv Dhawan, Gopal Singh, C.V.S. Rao, R.B. Misra, Hardev Singh, S. Ravindra Bhat

Srish Kumar Choudhury

State of Tripura and Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition regarding Scheduled Tribe status.

Remedy Sought

Restoration of Scheduled Tribe status for the Laskar community.

Filing Reason

State Government's exclusion of Laskar community from Scheduled Tribes list.

Previous Decisions

High Court dismissed the writ petition.

Issues

Inclusion of Laskar community in Scheduled Tribes list Criteria for determining Scheduled Tribe status

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued historical recognition as Scheduled Tribe Respondents maintained no formal inclusion in Presidential Order

Ratio Decidendi

Historical claims alone do not justify inclusion in the Scheduled Tribes list; legislative action is required for modifications to the Presidential Order.

Judgment Excerpts

Reservation has become important in view of the increasing competition in society and that probably had led to the anxiety of the appellant and the people in his community to claim reservation. Even if historically this tribe was covered by the general description of Tripura, that by itself may not justify its inclusion in the Order as a Scheduled Tribe.

Procedural History

The appeal was initially disposed of based on a statement from the Union of India regarding the review of the Laskar community's status, but was recalled for re-hearing due to inaction at the governmental level.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 341, 342
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Motor Accident Victim in Hit-and-Run Case Involving Multiple Vehicles and Insurers. The court held that the liability of insurers of negligent drivers is joint and several, and the claimant can recove...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Municipal Appointment Dispute Regarding Deputy Commissioners. Commissioner Alone Empowered to Appoint Promoted Deputy Commissioners from Revenue Officers of Bangalore City Corporation Under Section 84 of Karnataka Munic...