Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Societies Registration Act Case — Jurisdiction of Civil Court Affirmed. Court held that the exclusion of civil court jurisdiction must be expressly or impliedly indicated, and the provisions of Section 23 do not bar claims for rendition of accounts.

  • 13
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a civil suit filed by certain members of a registered society challenging the election of its office bearers and seeking a rendition of accounts. The appellant, Nagri Pracharini Sabha, contended that the suit was barred under Sections 23 and 25 of the Societies Registration Act, 1860. The lower courts ruled that the suit was maintainable, leading to the appeal before the Supreme Court. The court examined the jurisdiction of civil courts and the applicability of the cited sections of the Societies Registration Act. It established that a litigant has the right to file a civil suit unless expressly barred by law, emphasizing that the exclusion of civil court jurisdiction must be clear. The court noted that Section 23 pertains only to audit matters and does not relate to the relief of accounts, while Section 25 outlines conditions for disputes regarding office bearers but does not eliminate the right of members to seek remedies outside its scope. The court concluded that the bar of Section 25 was not applicable in this case, affirming the lower courts' decisions. The appeal was dismissed, and the trial court was directed to expedite the suit's disposal, considering any changes in circumstances. No costs were awarded.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Jurisdiction of Civil Courts - Right to Sue - A litigant has a right to institute a suit in civil court unless expressly or impliedly barred by statute - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Section 9 - The court held that the exclusion of civil court jurisdiction is not readily inferred and must be expressly or impliedly indicated. (Paras 973A-B)

B) Societies Registration Act - Provisions of Section 23 - Audit and Accounts - Section 23 confined to audit and does not pertain to rendition of accounts - Societies Registration Act, 1860, Sections 23, 25 - The court clarified that Section 23 relates solely to audit and does not bar claims for rendition of accounts. (Paras 976B)

C) Societies Registration Act - Disputes Regarding Office Bearers - Conditions for Maintainability - Section 25 requires specific conditions for disputes regarding office bearers - Societies Registration Act, 1860, Section 25 - The court found that Section 25 does not preclude members from seeking relief outside its purview, affirming the maintainability of the suit. (Paras 976C-E)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the civil suit challenging the election of office bearers of a society and seeking rendition of accounts is maintainable in the civil court.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the lower courts' decisions that the suit was maintainable and directed the trial court to expedite its disposal.

Law Points

  • Jurisdiction of civil courts
  • Bar of jurisdiction
  • Maintainability of civil suits
  • Provisions of Societies Registration Act
  • 1860
  • Sections 23 and 25
  • Code of Civil Procedure
  • 1908
  • Section 9
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1990 LawText (SC) (08) 34

Civil Appeal No. 2483 of 1982

1990-08-22

K. Ramaswamy, M.M. Punchhi

1990 SCR (3) 971, 1991 SCC Supl. (2) 36, JT 1990 (4) 160, 1990 SCALE (2) 404

Gobind Mukhoty, U.S. Prasad, Ms. Rachna Gupta, Ms. Rani Chhabra, M.C. Dhingra

Nagri Pracharini Sabha and Anr.

Vth Addl. Distt. and Sessions Judge, Varanasi and Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil suit challenging election of office bearers and seeking rendition of accounts.

Remedy Sought

Members of the society sought to challenge the election and obtain accounts.

Filing Reason

The suit was filed to address grievances regarding the election of office bearers.

Previous Decisions

Lower courts held that the suit was maintainable despite the appellant's objections.

Issues

Whether the civil suit is maintainable under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 Whether the provisions of Sections 23 and 25 bar the jurisdiction of civil courts

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the suit was barred under Sections 23 and 25 of the Societies Registration Act. The respondents contended that the civil court has jurisdiction to hear the suit.

Ratio Decidendi

A litigant has the right to institute a civil suit unless expressly or impliedly barred by statute; the exclusion of civil court jurisdiction must be clear. Sections 23 and 25 of the Societies Registration Act do not bar claims for rendition of accounts.

Judgment Excerpts

A litigant having a grievance of a civil nature has, independently of any statute, a right to institute a suit in the civil court unless its cognizance is either expressly or impliedly barred. The provisions of Section 23 of the Societies Registration Act, 1860 are confined to audit and have nothing to do with the relief of rendition of accounts. The bar of Section 25 is not applicable to the facts of the case.

Procedural History

The civil suit was filed in the Court of Civil Judge, Varanasi, challenging the election of office bearers. The appellant contested the maintainability based on Sections 23 and 25 of the Societies Registration Act. The lower courts ruled in favor of maintainability, leading to the appeal in the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Societies Registration Act, 1860: 23, 25
  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: 9
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Mother to Object in Succession Case for Legal Heirship Certificate Under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827 — Right to be Heard Before Grant of Certificate Upheld. The court held that even in summary proceedings under the Regul...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Municipal Action Against Unauthorized Construction in Writ Petition Under Article 226. Illegal Construction Cannot Be Regularized Merely by Filing Application After Notice; Owners Must Obtain Prior Permissions Under Maharash...