Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of Member of Rajya Sabha — Validity of Office of Profit Affirmed. The court upheld the disqualification of the petitioner under Article 102(1)(a) of the Constitution, affirming that the position held constituted an office of profit due to the associated benefits.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a writ petition filed by the petitioner challenging her disqualification as a Member of the Rajya Sabha based on her appointment as Chairperson of the Uttar Pradesh Film Development Council. The petitioner was appointed on 14th July 2004 and was conferred the rank of a Cabinet Minister, receiving various benefits including an honorarium and allowances. The Election Commission opined that this position constituted an 'office of profit' under Article 102(1)(a) of the Constitution, leading to her disqualification. The petitioner argued that her role was honorary and did not involve actual remuneration or benefits, claiming that she did not utilize the facilities provided. The court noted that the Council was not an autonomous body and that all expenses were borne by the State Government. It emphasized that the definition of 'office of profit' includes any position that could yield pecuniary gain, regardless of whether the individual actually received such benefits. The court dismissed the petition, affirming the Election Commission's opinion and the disqualification based on the potential for profit associated with the office held by the petitioner.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Disqualification of Members - Definition of Office of Profit - Constitution of India, 1950, Articles 102(1)(a), 103 - The court examined whether the position of Chairperson of the Uttar Pradesh Film Development Council constituted an office of profit, determining that the benefits associated with the position qualified as pecuniary gain, thus leading to disqualification under Article 102(1)(a). Held that the nature of the office and the potential for profit were decisive, regardless of actual receipt of benefits (Paras 6-12).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner was disqualified from being a Member of the Rajya Sabha due to holding an office of profit under the Government of Uttar Pradesh.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court dismissed the writ petition, affirming the disqualification of the petitioner as a Member of the Rajya Sabha due to holding an office of profit under Article 102(1)(a) of the Constitution.

Law Points

  • Disqualification
  • Office of Profit
  • Article 102
  • Article 103
  • Election Commission Opinion
  • Pecuniary Gain
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006 LawText (SC) (05) 20

Writ Petition (civil) 199 of 2006

2006-05-08

Y.K. Sabharwal, C.K. Thakker, R.V. Raveendran

Jaya Bachchan

Union of India and Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to disqualification as a Member of Rajya Sabha.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to overturn disqualification.

Filing Reason

Disqualification based on holding an office of profit.

Previous Decisions

Election Commission's opinion on disqualification.

Issues

Whether the petitioner held an office of profit under the Government of Uttar Pradesh Whether the disqualification was valid under Article 102(1)(a)

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the position was honorary and did not involve actual remuneration. Respondent maintained that the position constituted an office of profit due to associated benefits.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the definition of 'office of profit' includes any position that could yield pecuniary gain, regardless of actual receipt of benefits, and emphasized the importance of the potential for profit associated with the office.

Judgment Excerpts

The challenge in this petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, is to the order of the Hon’ble President of India, dated 16th March, 2006. The Election Commission... has expressed the opinion that the office of Chairperson of the Council... is an 'office of profit' under the Government of Uttar Pradesh.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 32 challenging the disqualification order issued by the President of India based on the Election Commission's opinion.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 102, Article 103
  • Parliament (Prevention of Disqualification) Act: Section 3
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Employees' Rights in Banking Amalgamation Case — Natural Justice Violated. The court ruled that the exclusion of employees from transferee banks without affording them an opportunity to be heard violated principles of natural ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Remands Customs Penalty Case for Fresh Consideration Due to Jurisdictional Issues. Collector's Authority to Impose Penalty Under Section 117 of the Customs Act, 1962, Affirmed.