Supreme Court Directs CBI to Register Case Following Non-Registration by Police. Court emphasizes mandatory duty of police to register FIR under Section 154 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.

In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal arose from the non-registration of a case by the police following complaints filed by the appellant on 9.9.1997 and 13.9.1997 regarding a cognizable offence. The appellant had been granted a stay order by the Delhi High Court protecting her possession of land, which was violated by the respondents. Despite filing complaints with the police, no case was registered, prompting the appellant to approach the High Court. The High Court noted the pendency of a contempt petition and suggested alternative remedies, ultimately dismissing the appellant's petition. The Supreme Court found that the High Court erred in its reasoning, reiterating that under Section 154(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the police are mandated to register a case upon receiving information of a cognizable offence without assessing its credibility. The court referenced previous judgments to underscore that the police officer's duty to register a case is non-negotiable. The Supreme Court directed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to register the case and conduct an investigation, emphasizing the need for an independent agency due to the allegations against police personnel. The CBI was instructed to complete the investigation within three months, and the High Court was requested to expedite the contempt petition's disposal.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Registration of FIR - Mandatory Duty of Police - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Section 154 - Police officers are statutorily obliged to register a case upon receiving information disclosing a cognizable offence without questioning the reliability of the information. The court held that the High Court erred in dismissing the petition on the grounds of alternative remedy and pending contempt petition, emphasizing that the police must register the case as per the mandatory provisions of Section 154(1) (Paras 31-33).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the police were obligated to register a case based on the appellant's complaint of a cognizable offence.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court directed the CBI to register a case and investigate the complaints filed by the appellant on 9.9.1997 and 13.9.1997, emphasizing the mandatory nature of registration under Section 154 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The CBI was instructed to complete the investigation within three months, and the High Court was requested to expedite the contempt petition's disposal.

Law Points

  • Mandatory registration of FIR
  • Cognizable offence
  • Police duty under Section 154
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • 1973
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006 LawText (SC) (02) 119

Appeal (crl.) 1229 of 2002

2006-02-21

H.K. Sema, Dr. AR. Lakshmanan

Vikas Singh

Ramesh Kumari

State (N.C.T. of Delhi) and Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the non-registration of a case by police following complaints of a cognizable offence.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought the registration of a case and investigation by the police.

Filing Reason

The appellant filed complaints regarding the violation of her possession of land.

Previous Decisions

The High Court dismissed the petition citing the pendency of a contempt petition and alternative remedies.

Issues

Whether the police were obligated to register a case based on the appellant's complaint of a cognizable offence.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the police failed to register a case despite receiving information of a cognizable offence. The respondent contended that the complaint was examined and found to be without merit.

Ratio Decidendi

The police are mandated to register a case upon receiving information of a cognizable offence without assessing the credibility of the information, as per Section 154 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Judgment Excerpts

The police officer cannot embark upon an enquiry as to whether the information... is reliable and genuine or otherwise and refuse to register a case. The provision of Section 154 of the Code is mandatory and the concerned officer is duty bound to register the case. The interest of justice would be better served if this Court directs the CBI to register the case and investigate the matter.

Procedural History

The appellant filed complaints with the police on 9.9.1997 and 13.9.1997, which were not registered. The appellant approached the High Court, which dismissed her petition, leading to the present appeal.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Section 154
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand in Connection with Marriage. The demand of Rs. 2 lakhs for purchasing a vehicle was not shown to be in connection with marriage, and therefore the pr...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Administrative Report on Juvenile Age Determination — Directs Formal Inquiry Under Juvenile Justice Act. The Court held that determination of juvenility must be done through a judicial inquiry under Section 7A of the Juven...