Supreme Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Arbitration Petition — Discretion in Nationality Not Mandatory. The court clarified that the Chief Justice has discretion in appointing a sole arbitrator and is not bound to select an arbitrator of a nationality different from that of the parties.

  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for the appointment of a sole arbitrator between MSA Nederland B.V., a company incorporated in the Netherlands, and M/s. Larsen & Toubro Ltd., an Indian company. The parties had entered into an agreement containing an arbitration clause, which specified that disputes would be resolved by a sole arbitrator, with arbitration to take place in England and conducted in English. Disputes arose regarding the appointment of the arbitrator, leading to the present application. The petitioner argued for the appointment of an arbitrator with a neutral nationality, citing Section 11(9) of the Act, which allows for such an appointment in international commercial arbitration. The court examined the language of Section 11(9), noting that the word 'may' conferred discretion upon the Chief Justice or his nominee, rather than imposing a mandatory requirement. The court referenced previous judgments, including Malaysian Airlines Systems BHD v. STIC Travels (P) Ltd. and Grid Corporation of Orissa Ltd. v. AES Corporation, which supported the interpretation that the provision was not obligatory. Consequently, the court appointed Mr. Justice S.N. Variava, a retired judge, as the sole arbitrator, leaving the determination of remuneration and costs to him. The petition was disposed of with directions for the Registry to forward the order to the appointed arbitrator.

Headnote

A) Arbitration Law - Appointment of Sole Arbitrator - Discretionary Power - Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 11(9) - The court clarified that the Chief Justice has discretion in appointing a sole arbitrator and is not bound to select an arbitrator of a nationality different from that of the parties. The use of 'may' in Section 11(9) indicates that it is not a mandatory requirement, allowing for flexibility in the appointment process. Held that the appointment of Mr. Justice S.N. Variava as sole arbitrator was valid (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Chief Justice is mandated to appoint a sole arbitrator of a nationality other than that of the parties involved.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court appointed Mr. Justice S.N. Variava as the sole arbitrator, determining that the requirement for a neutral nationality was not mandatory under Section 11(9) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Law Points

  • Arbitration
  • Sole Arbitrator Appointment
  • Nationality of Arbitrator
  • Discretionary Power of Chief Justice
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (SC) (11) 7

Arbitration Petition 22 of 2005

2005-11-29

Arun Kumar

MSA Nederland B.V.

M/s. Larsen & Toubro Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application for appointment of a sole arbitrator under arbitration agreement.

Remedy Sought

Appointment of a sole arbitrator.

Filing Reason

Disputes arose between the parties regarding the arbitration agreement.

Issues

Discretion of Chief Justice in appointing arbitrator Mandatory requirement of neutral nationality

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued for a neutral nationality arbitrator as per Section 11(9). Court examined the discretion conferred by the word 'may' in the provision.

Ratio Decidendi

The discretion of the Chief Justice in appointing an arbitrator is not bound by the requirement of nationality differing from that of the parties, as indicated by the use of 'may' in Section 11(9) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Judgment Excerpts

The key word in the above provision is ’may’ which leaves a discretion in the Chief Justice or his nominee. I hereby appoint Mr. Justice S.N. Variava, a retired Judge of this Court, as the sole arbitrator in this case.

Procedural History

Application filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of a sole arbitrator due to disputes arising from the agreement.

Acts & Sections

  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act: Section 11(9)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Health Worker Recruitment Process - Recruitment Process Found Valid and Conducted as per Advertisement Under Maharashtra Zilla Parishads District Services Rules.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Borrower's Rights in SARFAESI Act Dispute — Auction Process Invalidated Due to Procedural Irregularities.