Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal on Date of Birth Correction — Upholds Limitation Bar. The court ruled that the respondent's claim for correction was time barred under the U.P. Recruitment Service (Determination of Date of Birth) Rules, 1974.

In Favour of Accused
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a dispute regarding the correction of the respondent's date of birth from 30.07.1941 to 16.10.1945. The respondent, who was employed as a Sub-Divisional Inspector in the Education Department, filed a suit after 35 years to correct his date of birth, claiming it was incorrectly recorded in his High School Certificate. The trial court initially ruled in favor of the respondent, but the appellate court overturned this decision, citing lack of conclusive evidence and a violation of limitation rules. The respondent's appeal to the High Court resulted in a favorable ruling, which was subsequently challenged by the U.P. Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad in the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court found that the respondent's claim was indeed time barred, as per the U.P. Recruitment Service (Determination of Date of Birth) Rules, which stipulate that corrections must be made within two years of the issuance of the certificate. The court noted that the respondent had not provided sufficient evidence to support his claim and emphasized the importance of adhering to established service rules regarding date of birth corrections. Ultimately, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the appellate court's decision and setting aside the High Court's order.

Headnote

A) Limitation Law - Time Bar for Correction of Date of Birth - Claim for correction of date of birth filed after significant delay - U.P. Recruitment Service (Determination of Date of Birth) Rules, 1974 - The court held that the respondent's claim was barred by limitation as it was filed decades after the issuance of the High School Certificate, violating the stipulated two-year period for corrections. The court emphasized that such claims cannot be entertained at the fag end of service. Held that the suit was time barred (Paras 1-8).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondent's claim for change in date of birth from 30.07.1941 to 16.10.1945 is time barred.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the appellate court's decision and setting aside the High Court's order, ruling that the respondent's claim was time barred under the U.P. Recruitment Service (Determination of Date of Birth) Rules, 1974.

Law Points

  • Limitation
  • Government Records
  • Date of Birth Correction
  • Service Rules
  • High School Certificate
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (SC) (04) 67

Appeal (civil) 2798 of 2005

2005-04-21

Ashok Bhan, Dr. AR. Lakshmanan

Dr. R.G. Padia, Mr. B.B. Singh

U.P. Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad & Ors.

Raj Kumar Agnihotri

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Dispute regarding correction of date of birth in government records.

Remedy Sought

The respondent sought correction of his date of birth from 30.07.1941 to 16.10.1945.

Filing Reason

The respondent claimed his date of birth was incorrectly recorded in his High School Certificate.

Previous Decisions

The trial court ruled in favor of the respondent, but the appellate court overturned this decision citing lack of conclusive evidence and limitation.

Issues

Whether the respondent's claim for change in date of birth is time barred. Whether the High Court erred in its appreciation of the Government Notification and limitation laws.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellants argued that the respondent's claim was barred by limitation and lacked conclusive evidence. The respondent contended that the trial court's findings were based on proper appreciation of evidence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that corrections in government records regarding date of birth cannot be made at the fag end of service and must adhere to established rules and limitations.

Judgment Excerpts

The court held that the respondent's claim was barred by limitation as it was filed decades after the issuance of the High School Certificate. The respondent's date of birth having been written and declared by him in his examination form for High School and entered as such in High School Certificate could not be changed without having recourse to the law.

Procedural History

The respondent filed a Regular Suit No. 176 of 1995 for correction of date of birth, which was initially ruled in his favor by the trial court. The appellate court overturned this decision, leading to a second appeal in the High Court, which ruled in favor of the respondent. The appellants then appealed to the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • U.P. Recruitment Service (Determination of Date of Birth) Rules: Rule 2, Rule 7
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Caste Verification Committee Order Rejecting OBC Claim for 'Kalal' Caste — Failure to Produce Pre-1967 Permanent Residence Document Not Fatal When Vigilance Report Confirms Caste. The Court held that the Committee erred in...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Abolition of Odisha Administrative Tribunal — Power to Abolish SATs Upheld Under General Clauses Act and Article 323-A. The Court held that the Union Government has the power to abolish a State Administrat...