Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal on Wakf Properties — Affirmation of Wakf Status.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal against a judgment of the Allahabad High Court dismissing a writ petition concerning the status of certain properties claimed to be wakf. The properties were originally created as wakf by Mirza Mohammed Haider in 1926, with his son Piarey Mirza appointed as the Mutwalli. The wakf was registered under the U.P. Muslim Wakfs Act, 1936, and a notification was issued in 1954. In 1958, a collusive suit was filed by the Wakif against the Mutwalli, which was decreed on compromise without the Board of Wakfs being a party. Subsequently, the Wakif and Mutwalli transferred the properties to the appellant, who later faced a notice from the Shia Central Board of Wakf to hand over possession. The appellant's appeal against this notice was dismissed by the Civil Judge, leading to the writ petition before the High Court. The High Court upheld the wakf's status, stating that the registration and notification had not been challenged. The appellant argued that the properties had become secular due to changes in revenue records and the collusive decree. However, the court emphasized that the wakf character of the properties could not be extinguished by any act of the Mutwalli or anyone claiming through him. The Supreme Court found no reason to differ from the High Court's judgment and dismissed the appeal, affirming the properties' wakf status.

Headnote

A) Wakf Law - Creation and Continuation of Wakf - Properties retain wakf character despite revenue record alterations - U.P. Muslim Wakfs Act, 1936, Section 38; U.P. Muslim Wakfs Act, 1960, Section 29 - Court held that once a wakf is created, the properties vest in the Almighty and cannot be treated as secular properties by the Mutwalli or anyone claiming through him. The collusive decree between the Wakif and Mutwalli was void and did not affect the wakf status of the properties (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the properties in question ceased to be wakf properties due to alterations in revenue records and a collusive decree.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the High Court's judgment that the properties retained their wakf character and the collusive decree was void.

Law Points

  • Wakf creation
  • Collusive decree
  • Authority of Mutwalli
  • Registration of Wakf
  • Revenue records alteration
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2007 LawText (SC) (02) 324

Appeal (civil) 4816 of 2000

2007-02-13

Tarun Chatterjee, Altamas Kabir

K.K. Mohan

Chhedi Lal Misra (Dead) through LRS

Civil Judge, Lucknow & Ors

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the dismissal of a writ petition concerning wakf properties.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to quash the notice issued by the Deputy Commissioner regarding wakf properties.

Filing Reason

Notice received from the Shia Central Board of Wakf requesting possession of the properties.

Previous Decisions

Civil Judge dismissed the appeal against the notice, stating the compromise decree was not binding on the Board.

Issues

Whether the properties ceased to be wakf properties due to alterations in revenue records. Validity of the collusive decree between the Wakif and Mutwalli.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the properties were secular due to revenue record alterations and the collusive decree. Respondent contended that the properties remained wakf as the wakif and mutwalli had no authority to transfer them.

Ratio Decidendi

Once a wakf is created, the properties vest in the Almighty and cannot be treated as secular properties by the Mutwalli or anyone claiming through him.

Judgment Excerpts

The wakf was registered under Section 38 of the U.P. Muslim Wakfs Act, 1936. The law is well settled that once a wakf is created it continues to retain such character.

Procedural History

The appellant filed a writ petition against the dismissal of an appeal concerning a notice issued by the Shia Central Board of Wakf, which was preceded by a collusive decree in a suit filed by the Wakif.

Acts & Sections

  • U.P. Muslim Wakfs Act, 1936: Section 38
  • U.P. Muslim Wakfs Act, 1960: Section 29
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Partial Partition by Out-of-Court Arbitrators in Hindu Joint Family Dispute. Court holds that divisions voluntarily accepted and acted upon by parties are binding and only remaining properties are to be partitioned, not requirin...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment in Cross Appeals Over Interpretation of Trust Deed and Maintainability of Originating Summons. The Court Considers Whether Questions Pertaining to Trust Administration Fall Within the Exclusive Domain of the Charit...