Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Employment Transfer Case — Directs Union of India to Resolve Employment Status. Citing the need for clarity in employment status, the court mandated a decision on employee transfers under Section 11 of the Prasar Bharati Act, 1990.

In Favour of Accused
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from the employment status of individuals working for Prasar Bharati, which was established under the Prasar Bharati (Broadcasting Corporation of India) Act, 1990. The Act came into force on 15.09.1997, and the Corporation was established on 23.11.1997. Employees from Akashvani and Doordarshan were transferred to the Corporation, but no formal orders were issued regarding their transfer, leading to uncertainty about their employment status. The Central Administrative Tribunal quashed the orders of transfer, leading to an appeal by Prasar Bharati. The Supreme Court noted the conflicting views of different High Courts regarding the transfer of employees and highlighted the need for the Union of India to take decisive action regarding the employment status of these individuals. The court found that the employees had been functioning under the Corporation's control for an extended period, which implied a de facto transfer of their services. The court directed the Union of India to make a firm decision regarding the employees' status within six months, emphasizing that the uncertainty could not continue indefinitely. The appeal was allowed, and the previous judgments were set aside, but no costs were awarded.

Headnote

A) Employment Law - Transfer of Employees - Authority of Corporation to Transfer Employees - Prasar Bharati (Broadcasting Corporation of India) Act, 1990, Section 11 - The court examined whether the Corporation could transfer employees who were still technically employees of the Central Government. It held that the employees were under the functional control of the Corporation and thus the Corporation had the power to transfer them, despite the lack of formal orders of transfer from the Central Government (Paras 1-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Corporation has the power to transfer employees who are still considered employees of the Central Government.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned judgments, and directed the Union of India to take a firm decision regarding the employment status of the respondents under Section 11 of the Prasar Bharati Act within six months. The court emphasized the need to resolve the uncertainty surrounding the employees' status.

Law Points

  • Transfer of employees
  • powers of transfer
  • statutory functions
  • employment status
  • control of employees
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2007 LawText (SC) (02) 295

Appeal (civil) 3244 of 2002

2007-02-02

S.B. Sinha, Markandey Katju

Prasar Bharti & Ors

Amarjeet Singh & Ors

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Dispute regarding the employment status and transfer of employees of Prasar Bharati.

Remedy Sought

Prasar Bharati sought to quash the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal regarding employee transfers.

Filing Reason

The employees challenged the legality of their transfer orders.

Previous Decisions

The Central Administrative Tribunal quashed the transfer orders, leading to appeals in higher courts.

Issues

Whether the Corporation has the power to transfer employees who are still considered employees of the Central Government. The implications of the lack of formal transfer orders on employee status.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellants argued that the employees were under the control of the Corporation and thus could be transferred. The respondents contended that without formal transfer orders, they remained employees of the Central Government.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the Corporation had the power to transfer employees who were functioning under its control, despite the lack of formal transfer orders from the Central Government, and emphasized the need for the Union of India to resolve the employment status of these employees.

Judgment Excerpts

The short question which arises for consideration is as to whether in the peculiar situation obtaining in the matter, the Corporation can be said to have any power of transfer of the employees who although are working in its establishment, but continue to be the employees of the Central Government. We, therefore, are of the opinion that the High Court was not correct in opining that the respondents could not be transferred by the Corporation.

Procedural History

The case originated from the Central Administrative Tribunal's decision quashing transfer orders, followed by appeals to the Punjab and Haryana High Court and subsequently to the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Prasar Bharati (Broadcasting Corporation of India) Act: Section 11
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Plaintiff in Suit for Declaration and Possession — Agreement for Sale Terminated Due to Dishonoured Post-Dated Cheques. Defendants' Claim of Protected Tenancy and Part Performance Rejected as They Failed to Pay Balance Con...
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Grants Bail to NDPS Accused Due to Violation of Article 22(2) and Section 58 BNSS — Delay in Remand and Non-Furnishing of Arrest Grounds. Procedural Safeguards Override Section 37 NDPS Act Bar.