Supreme Court Orders Correction in Civil Appeal Judgment Due to Typographical Error. Court Corrects 'Appellant' to 'Respondent' in Judgment Dated 4.10.2007.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an application for correction in a prior judgment dated 4.10.2007. The petitioner, Hasthimal & Sons & Ors, sought to amend the judgment by changing the term 'appellant' to 'respondent' in the first line of paragraph 7. The court, after hearing the learned counsel for the parties, found that the requested correction was appropriate and ordered the substitution. The court clarified that no further modifications were required in the judgment. Consequently, the application was disposed of with the specified correction.

Headnote

A) Judicial Procedure - Correction of Judgment - Modification of terms in judgment - Not applicable - The court ordered the substitution of the word 'appellant' with 'respondent' in the judgment dated 4.10.2007, indicating that no other modifications were necessary. Held that the application for correction was disposed of accordingly (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a correction in the judgment dated 4.10.2007 is warranted.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court ordered the substitution of the word 'appellant' with 'respondent' in the judgment dated 4.10.2007 and disposed of the application.

Law Points

  • Judicial corrections
  • modification of judgments
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2007 LawText (SC) (02) 232

Appeal (civil) 3008 of 2001

2007-01-07

A.K. Mathur, H.S. Bedi

Hasthimal & Sons & Ors

P. Tej Ram Sharma

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application for correction in a prior judgment

Remedy Sought

Correction of the term 'appellant' to 'respondent'

Filing Reason

To rectify a typographical error in the judgment

Previous Decisions

Judgment dated 4.10.2007

Issues

Correction of judgment terms

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner sought to amend judgment terminology

Ratio Decidendi

The court recognized the need for accuracy in judicial language and allowed the correction of a typographical error.

Judgment Excerpts

In para 7 of our judgment dated 4.10.2007 in first line the word ’appellant’ shall be substituted with the word ’respondent’. Except the above correction, no other correction/modification is required in the judgment dated 4.10.2007.

Procedural History

Application for correction filed after the judgment dated 4.10.2007.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Respondent for Alleged Violation of Status Quo Order. The court found that the term 'status quo' was ambiguous and did not establish contempt as the parties were reverted to the position existing whil...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Remits Case to High Court for Fresh Consideration on Bona Fide Requirement of Additional Accommodation. The interpretation of 'personal use' under Section 11(8) of the Kerala Act is clarified, allowing broader application beyond existin...