Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Regarding Appropriate Government for Multi-State Co-operative Bank under Industrial Disputes Act. The court determined that the definition of 'Banking Company' in the ID Act is an instance of legislation by incorporation, leading to the conclusion that the appropriate government for a multi-state co-operative bank is the State Government.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose concerning the designation of the appropriate government for Bharat Co-operative Bank (Mumbai) Ltd., a multi-state co-operative bank, under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1946. The Bank was initially registered under the Maharashtra State Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, and later under the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 1984. The Co-operative Bank Employees Union, representing the Bank's employees, filed a complaint alleging victimization due to the transfer of employees. The Bank contended that as a banking company, the Central Government should be the appropriate government under the ID Act. The Industrial Court agreed with the Bank's objection, but the High Court reversed this decision, asserting that the Bank did not qualify as a 'Company' under the Companies Act, 1956. The Division Bench upheld the High Court's ruling, stating that the appropriate government was the State Government. The Supreme Court, upon hearing arguments from both sides, analyzed the legislative intent behind the ID Act and the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. It concluded that the definition of 'Banking Company' in the ID Act was incorporated by reference and not merely referenced, thus the amendments to the Banking Regulation Act did not affect the ID Act's definition. The court affirmed that the appropriate government for the multi-state co-operative bank was the State Government, dismissing the appeal and ordering the Bank to bear the costs of the respondent.

Headnote

A) Industrial Law - Appropriate Government - Definition of 'Banking Company' - Industrial Disputes Act, 1946, Section 2(bb) - The court held that the definition of 'Banking Company' in the ID Act is an instance of legislation by incorporation, thus the appropriate government for a multi-state co-operative bank is the State Government, not the Central Government (Paras 21-29).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Determination of the appropriate government for a multi-state co-operative bank under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1946

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming that the appropriate government for the multi-state co-operative bank was the State Government, and ordered the Bank to pay costs to the respondent.

Law Points

  • Appropriate Government
  • Multi-State Co-operative Bank
  • Industrial Disputes Act
  • 1946
  • Banking Regulation Act
  • 1949
  • Jurisdiction
  • Legislative Incorporation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2007 LawText (SC) (03) 98

Appeal (civil) 1542 of 2007

2007-03-22

CJI K.G. Balakrishnan, Lokeshwar Singh Panta, D.K. Jain

Mr. Jamshed Cama, Mr. Chander Uday Singh

Bharat Co-operative Bank (Mumbai) Ltd.

Co-operative Bank Employees Union

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Dispute regarding the appropriate government for a multi-state co-operative bank under the Industrial Disputes Act.

Remedy Sought

The Bank sought to establish that the Central Government was the appropriate government.

Filing Reason

The complaint was filed due to alleged victimization of employees through transfers.

Previous Decisions

The Industrial Court initially upheld the Bank's objection, which was later overturned by the High Court.

Issues

Determination of appropriate government under the Industrial Disputes Act Interpretation of 'Banking Company' under the ID Act

Submissions/Arguments

The Bank argued for the Central Government as the appropriate government based on its status as a banking company. The Union contended that the definition of 'Banking Company' did not include co-operative banks.

Ratio Decidendi

The definition of 'Banking Company' in the Industrial Disputes Act is an instance of legislation by incorporation, meaning subsequent amendments to the Banking Regulation Act do not affect its interpretation.

Judgment Excerpts

The appropriate government in relation to a multi-state co-operative bank, carrying on business in more than one state, would be the State Government. The definition of 'Banking Company' in the ID Act is an instance of legislation by incorporation.

Procedural History

The Industrial Court upheld the Bank's objection regarding jurisdiction, the High Court reversed this decision, and the Division Bench affirmed the High Court's ruling before the Supreme Court appeal.

Acts & Sections

  • Industrial Disputes Act, 1946: 2(a), 2(bb)
  • Banking Regulation Act, 1949: 5
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Permanent Stay of Winding Up of Svadeshi Mills Company Limited. Section 466 of Companies Act, 1956 does not permit stay of winding up after assets have been sold and substantial progress made in liquidation.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Sets Aside Award of Industrial Tribunal in Employment Dispute — Contractual Engagement Not Subject to Retrenchment Provisions.