Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petitions Challenging Invalid Notification in Criminal Procedure Case — No Error Apparent.

  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved review petitions filed by the petitioner against a previous order of the Supreme Court dismissing Special Leave Petitions concerning the validity of a Notification issued by the Government of Uttar Pradesh. The Notification, dated 8.10.1993, was challenged on the grounds that it was issued without consultation with the High Court, as mandated by Section 11(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The background of the case stemmed from the demolition of the Babri Masjid on 6th December 1992, leading to multiple criminal cases being registered. The High Court had previously ruled that the Notification was invalid, and the petitioner sought to review the Supreme Court's dismissal of the Special Leave Petitions. The court analyzed whether the High Court's conclusion regarding the lack of consultation was justified, noting that both parties conceded to this fact. The court found no error in its earlier dismissal of the Special Leave Petitions and dismissed the review petitions, while correcting a typographical error in the previous order. The court emphasized that the State Government had the discretion to issue a fresh notification to rectify the situation if it chose to do so.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Invalid Notification - Lack of Consultation with High Court - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Section 11(1) - The court upheld the High Court's finding that the Notification dated 8.10.1993 was invalid as it was issued without prior consultation with the High Court, which is a requirement under the law. The court noted that the State Government could rectify this by issuing a fresh notification after proper consultation (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Notification dated 8.10.1993 was invalid due to lack of consultation with the High Court.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the review petitions, finding no merit in the claims and correcting a typographical error in the previous order.

Law Points

  • Review of orders
  • consultation with High Court
  • jurisdiction of Special Courts
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • invalid notifications
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2007 LawText (SC) (03) 87

Review Petition (crl.) 163-166 of 2003

2007-03-22

K.G. Balakrishnan, G.P. Mathur, R.V. Raveendran

Mohd. Aslam @ Bhure

State of U.P. & Ors

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Review of Supreme Court order dismissing Special Leave Petitions regarding a Notification's validity.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to review the dismissal of Special Leave Petitions.

Filing Reason

Challenging the validity of Notification dated 8.10.1993 for lack of consultation with the High Court.

Previous Decisions

The Supreme Court had previously dismissed the Special Leave Petitions on 29.11.2002.

Issues

Validity of Notification dated 8.10.1993 Requirement of consultation with High Court

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the Notification was invalid due to lack of consultation. State's position on the necessity of the Notification's validity.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the Notification was invalid due to lack of consultation with the High Court, which is a requirement under Section 11(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Judgment Excerpts

The Notification dated 8.10.1993 was invalid as it was issued without prior consultation with the High Court. The State Government could rectify this by issuing a fresh notification after proper consultation.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed review petitions against the dismissal of Special Leave Petitions concerning the validity of a Notification issued by the State Government. The Supreme Court had previously dismissed these petitions, leading to the current review.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Section 11(1)
  • General Clauses Act, 1897: Section 21
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Appeals of Cooperative Federation Against High Court's Order on Employee Surplus Declaration. The court affirmed that the determination of surplus employees must adhere to established service regulations and seniority principles...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Re-examination of Witness in Civil Suit. Re-examination Permissible to Explain Ambiguities Arising from Cross-Examination Under Order 18 Rule 4 CPC.