Case Note & Summary
The case involved a contempt petition filed by the landlord, Santanu Chaudhuri, against the tenant, Subir Ghosh, for failing to vacate the premises as ordered by the Supreme Court. The eviction suit initiated by the landlord was initially dismissed but later allowed by the Calcutta High Court, leading to a decree for eviction against the tenant. The tenant subsequently filed a Special Leave Petition, which was dismissed with a directive to vacate by 31st August 2006, contingent upon filing an affidavit. The landlord filed a contempt petition when the tenant did not vacate by the deadline. The tenant contended that no undertaking was filed, thus no contempt could be claimed. The court examined precedents regarding contempt and concluded that the absence of an undertaking did not preclude the landlord from seeking compliance with the court's order. The court directed the trial court to ensure the landlord's possession of the premises, allowing for police assistance if necessary, and awarded costs to the landlord. The tenant was given one month to deposit the costs, failing which the trial court was instructed to recover the amount. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Headnote
A) Contempt of Court - Non-compliance with Court Orders - Tenant's failure to vacate premises - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Section 151 - The court directed the trial court to ensure delivery of vacant possession to the landlord, emphasizing the need for compliance with its orders despite the absence of an undertaking from the tenant. Held that the court must ensure justice is served by facilitating the landlord's right to possession (Paras 5-6).
Issue of Consideration
Whether the tenant's failure to vacate the premises constituted contempt of court.
Final Decision
The Supreme Court directed the trial court to ensure delivery of vacant possession of the premises to the landlord, allowing for police assistance if necessary, and awarded costs to the landlord. The tenant was granted one month to deposit the costs, failing which the trial court was instructed to recover the amount.
Law Points
- Contempt of Court
- Eviction
- Undertaking
- Civil Procedure
- Compliance with Court Orders



