Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court's Transfer Order in Civil Suit Case Due to Lack of Sufficient Grounds. Transfer Application Denied as Respondent Had Previously Pursued the Case for Two Years in Faridabad.

In Favour of Accused
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal by Iqbaljit Singh against an order of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, which had allowed a transfer of a civil suit from Faridabad to Chandigarh. The suit was initiated by Pritam Kaur in 2004, seeking declaration and injunction. The High Court's decision was based on the respondent's claim of being an elderly person unable to pursue the case in Faridabad. The Supreme Court, upon reviewing the circumstances, noted that the respondent had actively pursued the case for two years before seeking transfer. The Court found that the reasons provided did not constitute a valid ground for transferring the suit. Consequently, the Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order, directing the trial court in Faridabad to resolve the suit within four months, while ensuring cooperation from both parties. The Court scheduled a hearing for January 7, 2008, and stated that no costs would be awarded.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Transfer of Civil Suit - Grounds for Transfer - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Section 24 - The High Court allowed a transfer application citing the old age of the respondent as a reason. However, the Supreme Court held that the respondent had previously pursued the case for two years in Faridabad and no sufficient grounds were established for the transfer, thus setting aside the High Court's order (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the High Court's order to transfer the civil suit from Faridabad to Chandigarh was justified.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order allowing the transfer of the civil suit, directing the trial court at Faridabad to decide the suit within four months without unnecessary adjournments.

Law Points

  • Transfer of civil suits
  • grounds for transfer
  • jurisdiction of courts
  • Code of Civil Procedure
  • 1908
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2007 LawText (SC) (12) 118

Appeal (civil) 6070 of 2007

2007-12-13

Tarun Chatterjee, Dalveer Bhandari

Iqbaljit Singh

Pritam Kaur & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil suit for declaration and injunction

Remedy Sought

Transfer of civil suit from Faridabad to Chandigarh

Filing Reason

Respondent claimed inability to pursue case in Faridabad due to old age

Previous Decisions

High Court allowed transfer application on September 25, 2006

Issues

Justification for transfer of civil suit Grounds for transfer under Section 24

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the transfer was unjustified as the respondent had pursued the case for two years. Respondent claimed inability to attend court in Faridabad due to age.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court held that the reasons for transfer cited by the respondent were insufficient, given her prior active participation in the case for two years in Faridabad.

Judgment Excerpts

The reasons offered for transfer at the instance of the respondent could not be taken as a good ground for transferring the suit. Only because of the old age of the respondent, the suit could not have been transferred to Chandigarh.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against the High Court's order dated September 25, 2006, allowing the transfer of the civil suit.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 24
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging Revisional Authority's Order Granting Rebate to Merchant Exporter. Rebate Claim Under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 Is Independent of Manufacturer's Bogus Cenvat Credit.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Challenge Against Cancellation of Scheduled Caste Certificate Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Scrutiny Committee's Order Set Aside for Failure to Provide Opportunity and Conduct Vigilance Enquiry Under Mahar...