Supreme Court Disposes Appeal in Rent Control Matter — Interim Rent Determination Upheld. The High Court's jurisdiction to entertain a revision petition regarding interim rent fixation was questioned under Section 13(3) of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1950.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal by the appellants against a judgment of the Rajasthan High Court which reversed an order of the Additional District Judge regarding the determination of interim rent under the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1950. The appellants had purchased two shops and sought eviction of the respondents for non-payment of rent. The Trial Court had determined the interim rent, which was affirmed by the First Appellate Court. The respondents filed a revision petition in the High Court, which was deemed not maintainable. The appellants contended that the High Court should not have entertained the revision petition as it pertained to an interlocutory order. The Supreme Court, while not delving into the merits of the case, ordered that the respondents continue to deposit rent in court monthly, allowing the appellants to withdraw the amount upon providing a bank guarantee until it reached Rs.1,29,000/-. The Court emphasized the need to balance equities between the parties, given the ongoing appeals regarding the refusal of specific performance and the refund of Rs.1,29,000/- to the appellants. The appeal was disposed of without costs.

Headnote

A) Rent Control - Interim Rent Fixation - High Court's Jurisdiction - Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1950, Section 13(3) - The High Court should not have entertained the revision petition as the order of fixation of rent was an interlocutory order. The Supreme Court directed that the respondents continue to deposit rent in court, allowing appellants to withdraw upon furnishing a bank guarantee until the amount reached Rs.1,29,000/- (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the High Court should have entertained the revision petition regarding the interim rent fixation.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court disposed of the appeal, directing the respondents to continue depositing rent in court and allowing the appellants to withdraw upon furnishing a bank guarantee until the amount reached Rs.1,29,000/-. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Interim rent fixation
  • Revision petition maintainability
  • Specific performance
  • Rent deposit arrangement
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2008 LawText (SC) (02) 616

Appeal (civil) 7964 of 2001

2008-02-14

A.K. Mathur, Aftab Alam

Imamuddin & Anr.

Mond. Ismail & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the High Court's order reversing the determination of interim rent.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to uphold the interim rent determination.

Filing Reason

Respondents filed a revision petition against the interim rent fixation.

Previous Decisions

The Trial Court's order on interim rent was affirmed by the First Appellate Court.

Issues

Maintainability of revision petition regarding interim rent fixation Equitable arrangement for rent deposit

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the High Court should not have entertained the revision petition as it was an interlocutory order. Respondents contended their right to contest the eviction and seek specific performance.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court's jurisdiction to entertain a revision petition regarding interim rent fixation was limited, as such orders are considered interlocutory.

Judgment Excerpts

The High Court ought not to have entertained the revision petition filed by the respondents as the order of fixation of rent was purely an interlocutory order. We think it just and proper that the respondents shall continue to deposit in Court the rent month by month.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against the High Court's order reversing the Additional District Judge's dismissal of the respondents' appeal regarding interim rent.

Acts & Sections

  • Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1950: Section 13(3)
  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 115
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Collector's Order in Customs Import Case — Import of Beef Tallow Declared Unlawful. The court found that the import of beef tallow was prohibited under the Import Policy at the time, justifying the penalty imposed under the Cu...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses University's Petition Challenging Tribunal Order Setting Aside Retirement of Professor-Cum-Director at Age 60. Retirement Age of Director Held to Be 65 Years Under Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 and University Ordinanc...