Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals on Delay in Reference Under Central Excise Act — Condonation Not Permissible. Condonation of delay in seeking a reference under Section 35-H of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is not permissible.

  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved appeals filed by M/s Goodearth Steels Pvt. Ltd against the Commissioner of Central Excise, Kanpur. The primary issue was whether there was a power to condone the delay in seeking a reference under Section 35-H of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The court considered the legal provisions and determined that the condonation of delay was not permissible. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed without costs. The judgment emphasized the lack of authority to condone delays in this context, affirming the legal interpretation of the relevant section of the Act.

Headnote

A) Central Excise Law - Condonation of Delay - Power to Condone Delay - Central Excise Act, 1944, Section 35-H - The court examined the issue of whether the delay in seeking a reference could be condoned under the provisions of the Central Excise Act. It was held that such power for condonation of delay does not exist, leading to the dismissal of the appeals. (Paras 1).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether there was power for condonation of delay in seeking a reference under Section 35-H of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, holding that there was no power for condonation of delay in seeking a reference under Section 35-H of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

Law Points

  • Condonation of delay
  • Central Excise Act
  • 1944
  • Section 35-H
  • Reference under Central Excise Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2008 LawText (SC) (02) 350

Civil Appeal Nos. 699-700 of 2006

2008-02-14

Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, P. SATHASIVAM

M/s Goodearth Steels Pvt. Ltd

Commnr. Of Central Excise, Kanpur

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal regarding condonation of delay in seeking a reference.

Remedy Sought

M/s Goodearth Steels Pvt. Ltd sought to challenge the decision regarding delay.

Issues

Power to condone delay under Section 35-H of the Central Excise Act

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued for the power to condone delay. The respondent contended that such power does not exist.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the provisions of the Central Excise Act do not allow for the condonation of delay in seeking a reference under Section 35-H.

Judgment Excerpts

The only question that arises for consideration is whether there was power for condonation of delay in seeking a reference under Section 35-H of the Central Excise Act, 1944. That being so, these appeals deserve to be dismissed which we direct.

Procedural History

The appeals were filed against the Commissioner of Central Excise regarding the issue of delay in seeking a reference.

Acts & Sections

  • Central Excise Act, 1944: Section 35-H
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Removal of Officer in Border Security Force Case Due to Procedural Violations. Removal Found Justified Based on Evidence of Misconduct and Proper Application of Rule 20.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Pension Revision for Retired Employees under Employees' Pension Scheme, 1995 — Upholds Right to Higher Pension Based on Actual Salary. The court held that employees who opted to contribute on actual salary are entitled to p...