Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition for Lack of Merit. Court found no substantial grounds to reconsider the earlier decision, leading to the dismissal of the review petition.

  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a review petition filed by Rameshwar through legal representatives against Mahant Beharidas. The Supreme Court of India reviewed the petition and the associated records but concluded that there was no merit in the arguments presented. The court rejected the application for permission to make oral submissions and ultimately dismissed the review petition. The decision was made by a bench comprising Justices Tarun Chatterjee and Dalveer Bhandari on 5th February 2008. The court's analysis indicated that the review petition did not warrant further consideration, leading to its dismissal.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Review Petition - Dismissal for Lack of Merit - Supreme Court of India, 2008 - The court assessed the review petition and found no merit in the submissions made. Consequently, the review petition was dismissed without allowing oral submissions (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the review petition had merit

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the review petition for lack of merit, rejecting the application for oral submissions.

Law Points

  • Review petitions
  • merit assessment
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2008 LawText (SC) (02) 293

Review Petition (civil) 1643 of 2007

2008-02-05

Tarun Chatterjee, Dalveer Bhandari

Rameshwar (D) thru LRS

Mahant Beharidas

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Review petition against a previous decision

Remedy Sought

Review of the earlier judgment

Issues

Merit of the review petition

Submissions/Arguments

No merit found in the review petition Oral submissions not permitted

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that the review petition did not present substantial grounds for reconsideration of the earlier decision.

Judgment Excerpts

We do not find any merit therein. The Review Petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

Procedural History

The review petition was filed in connection with SLP(C) No.17596 of 2007.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Directs Compliance of Deputy Director's Order for Reinstatement of Teacher in Service Dispute. Petitioner's appointment by Head Master challenged as illegal, but court upholds reinstatement based on prior orders and pending proceedi...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Remands Ejectment Case to Appellate Authority for Fresh Determination of Landlord's Personal Necessity Under Rent Act. Legal heirs of deceased landlord permitted to establish bona fide requirement for personal residence after retirement...