Supreme Court Transfers Criminal Cases from Karnataka to Andhra Pradesh Due to Lack of Counter Affidavit. Transfer of cases ordered under Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to ensure fair administration of justice.

  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a transfer petition filed under Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by L.N. Agarwal seeking the transfer of three criminal cases from Karnataka to another state. The cases included FIR No. 157/2006 pending in the Court of the Principal Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bidar, and two other cases pending in the Judicial Magistrate's Court in Humnabad. The State of Karnataka did not file a counter affidavit despite being given time. After hearing the counsel for both parties and reviewing the petition, the Supreme Court deemed it appropriate to transfer the cases to Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh. The court ordered the District Judge of Bidar to send the entire record of the cases to the District Judge in Hyderabad, who would assign them to a competent court for disposal. The transfer was granted to ensure fair proceedings.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Transfer of Cases - Jurisdictional Transfer - Section 406 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Transfer petitions were filed seeking the transfer of three cases from Karnataka to another state due to the absence of a counter affidavit from the State of Karnataka. The court found it appropriate to transfer the cases to Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, directing the District Judge, Bidar to transmit the records accordingly - Held that the transfer was necessary for the fair administration of justice (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the transfer of three criminal cases from Karnataka to another state is warranted.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the transfer petition, directing the transfer of three criminal cases from Karnataka to Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, and ordered the District Judge of Bidar to send the records to the District Judge in Hyderabad.

Law Points

  • Transfer of cases
  • Section 406 Cr.P.C.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2008 LawText (SC) (03) 266

Transfer Petition (crl.) 172 of 2007

2008-03-24

Ashok Bhhan, Dalveer Bhandari

L.N. Agarwal

Meerajuddin N. Patel etc.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Transfer petition for criminal cases

Remedy Sought

Transfer of cases from Karnataka to another state

Filing Reason

To ensure fair trial and administration of justice

Issues

Transfer of criminal cases Jurisdictional concerns

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner sought transfer due to lack of counter affidavit from the State State did not file a counter affidavit

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the necessity of transferring cases to ensure fair administration of justice under Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Judgment Excerpts

We order accordingly. The Transfer Petition is allowed accordingly.

Procedural History

Transfer Petition filed under Section 406 Cr.P.C. seeking transfer of three cases from Karnataka to another state.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 406
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Tenant's Appeal Against Eviction Order Under Rent Act — Subsequent Repairs Rendered Eviction Unnecessary.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Housing Board's Cancellation of Allotment Due to Concealment of Facts. Court found that the appellant's failure to disclose ownership of a flat rendered him ineligible under the Chandigarh Housing Board regulati...