Supreme Court Directs Consideration for Compassionate Appointment in Missing Person Case. The court emphasized the need for evaluating claims under compassionate appointment schemes despite the absence of explicit provisions for missing persons.

In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal filed by the widow and son of Suresh Tiwary, a Havildar in the Bihar police department, who had been missing since 1988 after his transfer from Munger to Siwan District. In 1998, the widow applied for tracing her husband or for her son to be appointed on compassionate grounds. The department declared Suresh Tiwary dead in 2002, but the application for compassionate appointment was rejected by the State on the grounds that there was no provision for dependants of missing persons. The appellants challenged this rejection in a writ petition, which was dismissed by a single judge, and subsequently, their appeal was also dismissed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Patna. The Supreme Court noted that while the State admitted the existence of a compassionate appointment scheme, it rejected the application based on the missing status of Suresh Tiwary. The court highlighted that he was declared dead only in 2002 and directed the State to reconsider the second appellant's claim for compassionate appointment in light of the scheme, if found eligible. The appeal was disposed of with parties bearing their respective costs.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Compassionate Appointment - Eligibility of Dependants of Missing Persons - Not applicable under existing provisions - The court directed the State to consider the claim of the second appellant for compassionate appointment despite the absence of explicit provisions for missing persons, given that the missing person was declared dead only in 2002. The court emphasized the need to evaluate the claim under the compassionate appointment scheme (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the dependants of a missing government servant are entitled to compassionate appointment after the person is declared dead.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court directed the State to reconsider the claim of the second appellant for compassionate appointment in accordance with the existing scheme, if found eligible, and disposed of the appeal with parties bearing their respective costs.

Law Points

  • Compassionate appointment
  • Missing persons
  • Government servant
  • Appointment scheme
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2008 LawText (SC) (03) 262

Civil Appeal No. 2356 of 2008

2008-03-28

CJI K G Balakrishnan, R V Raveendran

Suhavan Devi & Anr

State of Bihar & Ors

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against rejection of compassionate appointment application.

Remedy Sought

Appointment on compassionate grounds for the son of a missing government servant.

Filing Reason

Rejection of application for compassionate appointment by the State.

Previous Decisions

Writ petition and L.P.A. were dismissed by the High Court.

Issues

Entitlement of dependants of missing persons to compassionate appointment Validity of State's rejection based on missing status

Submissions/Arguments

The State argued there is no provision for compassionate appointment for missing persons. The appellants contended that the declaration of death should allow for compassionate appointment.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the absence of explicit provisions for compassionate appointment of missing persons does not preclude consideration of claims under the compassionate appointment scheme once the person is declared dead.

Judgment Excerpts

The department considered the matter and declared the missing person - Suresh Tiwary - dead by order dated 26.3.2002. In the peculiar facts and circumstances, the fourth respondent is directed to consider the claim of the second appellant in accordance with the scheme for compassionate appointment.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed after the rejection of the compassionate appointment application by the State and subsequent dismissal of the writ petition and L.P.A. by the High Court.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Clarifies Pension Computation for Women SSCOs in One-Time Pensionary Benefits Case — Notional Increments and Commutation Factor to Be Based on Deemed Completion of 20 Years. The Court held that pensionary payments must be computed on ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Service Seniority Dispute Upholding High Court Direction to Consider Original Writ Petitioner for Promotion. Redesignation of Octroi Moharrar as Clerk Dates Back to Initial Appointment, Making Seniority List Illegal ...