Supreme Court Modifies Eviction Order in Civil Appeal Due to Financial Obligation Adjustment. Court upheld the eviction order but found the rent payment directive from 1980 unnecessary, modifying the High Court's order accordingly.

  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal filed by Shafiullah against the judgment and final order dated 22.01.2008 of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, in Writ Petition No.163 of 2007. The appeal arose from a Special Leave Petition concerning an eviction order. The Supreme Court heard the arguments from both parties and determined that the eviction order issued by the High Court should not be interfered with. However, the Court found it appropriate to modify the High Court's order by removing the requirement for the appellant to pay Rs.200/- per month starting from 01.04.1980 until possession was delivered. The Court extended the time for filing an undertaking before the High Court by an additional month. The appeal was disposed of without any order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Eviction - Modification of Eviction Order - High Court's Direction on Rent - Civil Procedure - Court modified the High Court's order by deleting the direction to pay Rs.200/- per month from 01.04.1980 until possession is delivered, while upholding the eviction order. The court found no reason to interfere with the eviction order but adjusted the financial obligation imposed by the High Court. Held that the modification was necessary under the circumstances (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the High Court's order of eviction and the direction to pay rent should be interfered with.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court upheld the eviction order but modified the High Court's directive to pay Rs.200/- per month from 01.04.1980 until possession is delivered, finding it unnecessary. The time for filing an undertaking was extended by one month.

Law Points

  • Eviction
  • Modification of Orders
  • Special Leave Petition
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2008 LawText (SC) (03) 78

Civil Appeal No.1796 of 2008

2008-03-03

Tarun Chatterjee, Harjit Singh Bedi

Shafiullah

Mohd. Zakaria & Anr

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal concerning eviction and financial obligations.

Remedy Sought

Modification of the High Court's order regarding rent payment.

Filing Reason

Appeal against the High Court's eviction order and financial directive.

Previous Decisions

High Court ordered eviction and directed payment of Rs.200/- per month.

Issues

Whether the High Court's order of eviction should be interfered with Whether the financial obligation imposed by the High Court was justified

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued against the financial obligation imposed by the High Court. The respondent supported the High Court's order.

Ratio Decidendi

The court upheld the eviction order while modifying the financial obligation, indicating that such obligations should be just and reasonable.

Judgment Excerpts

The order of the High Court is modified to that extent. There shall be no order as to costs.

Procedural History

The appeal arose from a Special Leave Petition against the High Court's order in Writ Petition No.163 of 2007.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in West Bengal Sales Tax Act Case — Clarifies Obligations of Customs House Agents. The court found that a Customs House Agent is liable under Section 68 for ensuring compliance with transport regulations.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Andhra Pradesh Hears Writ Petitions Seeking Compensation Under Land Acquisition Act for Occupants of Government Land. Court Assesses Whether Tax Payments and Continuous Possession Confer Rights Under Section 3(n) of Right to Fair Compen...