Supreme Court Remits Case for Fresh Decision on Second Appeal and Additional Evidence Application. The High Court's failure to address the application for additional evidence during the second appeal proceedings necessitated a remand for fresh consideration under Order 41 Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal filed by Ramesh Chand and another against the Ghaziabad Development Authority concerning a second appeal dismissed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The High Court dismissed the second appeal on the grounds that reappraisal of evidence was not permitted. During the pendency of the second appeal, the appellants filed an application for acceptance of additional evidence under Order 41, Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which was not decided by the High Court. The Supreme Court found that the High Court's procedure of not addressing the application for additional evidence was improper. The Court emphasized that the application should have been dealt with at the time of the second appeal's disposal. Consequently, the Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment and remitted the case back for a fresh decision on the second appeal along with the application for additional evidence, instructing the High Court to resolve the matter within two months without unnecessary adjournments. The Court did not make any order regarding costs.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Second Appeal - Non-Decision on Additional Evidence - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Order 41 Rule 27 - The High Court's failure to decide the application for additional evidence during the second appeal proceedings was improper, necessitating a remand for fresh consideration. The Supreme Court directed the High Court to decide the second appeal along with the application for additional evidence within two months (Paras 2-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the High Court erred in not deciding the application for additional evidence under Order 41 Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure during the disposal of the second appeal.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment and remitted the case back for a fresh decision on the second appeal along with the application for additional evidence, to be decided within two months without unnecessary adjournments.

Law Points

  • Order 41 Rule 27 CPC
  • second appeal
  • additional evidence
  • reappraisal of evidence
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2008 LawText (SC) (03) 1

Civil Appeal No. 2349 of 2008

2008-03-31

Tarun Chatterjee, Harjit Singh Bedi

Vijay Hansaria

Ramesh Chand and Anr

Ghaziabad Development Authority and Ors

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal concerning the dismissal of a second appeal by the High Court.

Remedy Sought

The appellants sought a fresh decision on their second appeal and the application for additional evidence.

Filing Reason

The High Court dismissed the second appeal without addressing the application for additional evidence.

Previous Decisions

The High Court had dismissed the second appeal on the grounds of not permitting reappraisal of evidence.

Issues

Whether the High Court erred in not deciding the application for additional evidence during the second appeal.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellants argued that the High Court should have decided the application for additional evidence. The respondents contended that the application could not be entertained as the appellants failed to satisfy the conditions for acceptance.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court's failure to address the application for additional evidence under Order 41 Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure during the second appeal proceedings was improper, necessitating a remand for fresh consideration.

Judgment Excerpts

The High Court was required to deal with the application under Order 41 Rule 27 of the Code at the time of disposal of the second appeal. We set aside the same and remit the case back to the High Court for decision of the second appeal afresh.

Procedural History

The appeal arose from SLP (C) No. 8287 of 2006, leading to the dismissal of the second appeal by the High Court on 8th February 2006.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order 41 Rule 27
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction for Murder — Upholds Findings of Lower Courts. The court confirmed the conviction of the appellants under Section 302 IPC based on credible eyewitness testimony despite the acquittal of a co-accused...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Employees' Right to Bonus Under Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 — Clarifies Applicability Despite Authorised Controller Appointment.