Supreme Court Allows Transfer of Family Court Case to Raipur Due to Safety Concerns. Transfer Granted Based on Assurance of Safety from Petitioner's Counsel, with Provision for Further Transfer if Necessary Under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a transfer petition filed by the petitioner-wife under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to move HMP Case No. 88 of 2007 from the Family Court in Indore, Madhya Pradesh, to the Family Court in Raipur, Chhattisgarh. The respondent-husband expressed concerns for his safety if he were to attend proceedings in Raipur, requesting that the case be transferred elsewhere. In response, the wife's counsel provided assurances that no harm would come to the husband in Raipur. The Supreme Court, considering these assurances, decided to transfer the case to Raipur, while also allowing the respondent the option to seek further transfer if any untoward incidents occurred. The court directed the transferor court to send all relevant records to the transferee court immediately. The transfer petition was thus allowed under the specified terms.

Headnote

A) Family Law - Transfer of Cases - Safety Concerns - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Section 25 - The petitioner sought transfer of a family court case to a different jurisdiction, while the respondent raised safety concerns regarding attending proceedings in the new location. The court allowed the transfer based on the assurance from the petitioner's counsel regarding the respondent's safety, with a provision for further transfer if necessary. Held that the case was transferred to ensure judicial proceedings could continue without undue risk (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the transfer of the case to Raipur poses a danger to the respondent's life.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the transfer of HMP Case No. 88 of 2007 from the Family Court, Indore, Madhya Pradesh to the Family Court, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, based on the assurance of safety provided by the petitioner's counsel. The court also stated that the respondent could seek further transfer if any untoward incident occurred.

Law Points

  • Transfer of cases
  • safety concerns
  • assurance by counsel
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2008 LawText (SC) (04) 129

Transfer Petition (civil) 950 of 2007

2008-04-21

ASHOK BHAN, DALVEER BHANDARI

Amisha Hinduja

Manish Hinduja

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Transfer petition for family court case

Remedy Sought

Transfer of case to Raipur

Filing Reason

Safety concerns raised by the respondent

Issues

Safety of the respondent in attending court proceedings Jurisdiction for family court case transfer

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner assured safety of the respondent in Raipur Respondent expressed concerns for his life if transferred to Raipur

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the importance of ensuring safety while allowing judicial proceedings to continue, balancing the interests of both parties.

Judgment Excerpts

We transfer the aforesaid case No. 88 of 2007 from the Family Court, Indore, Madhya Pradesh to the Family Court, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. If any untoward incident happens, the respondent is put at liberty to approach this Court for transferring this case to a place other than Raipur.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a transfer petition under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking transfer of a family court case due to safety concerns raised by the respondent.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 25
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Allows Petition in Births and Deaths Registration Matter — Registrar Directed to Correct Birth Certificate Entries Under Section 15 of Births and Deaths Registration Act, 1969. The Court held that the Registrar has statutory powe...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Dismissal of Public Interest Litigation — Lack of Genuine Public Interest Established.