Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Regarding Inclusion of Royalty in Assessable Value of Concentrates. The court affirmed that the royalty charged for trademark use was integral to the sale of concentrates under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

  • 8
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved appeals filed by M/s Pepsi Foods Limited against the Collector of Central Excise regarding the inclusion of royalty charges in the assessable value of concentrates sold to bottlers. The disputes arose from the periods 1.9.1992 to 31.3.1993 and 1.4.1993 to 31.12.1993, during which the appellant filed pricelists that included royalty charges for the use of the trademark 'lehar'. The Central Excise authorities issued show cause notices proposing the inclusion of these charges in the assessable value, which the appellant contested, arguing that the sale of concentrate and the collection of royalty were separate transactions. The adjudicating authority and the appellate Collector upheld the inclusion of royalty, leading to appeals to the Tribunal, which confirmed the earlier decisions. The Tribunal found that the agreement with the bottlers was a composite arrangement linking the sale of concentrate with the use of the trademark, thus establishing a nexus between the two. The appellant contended that the royalty was paid based on the maximum retail price of the beverages sold by the bottlers and was not related to the sale value of the concentrate. However, the court emphasized that the overall consideration for the sale included both the sale price and the royalty, which was inseparable from the transaction. The court dismissed the appeals, affirming the Tribunal's decision and allowing the appellant to raise questions regarding the computation of royalty before the adjudicating authority. The appeals were dismissed without costs, subject to the observation regarding the quantum of royalty (Paras 1-6).

Headnote

A) Central Excise Law - Valuation of Goods - Inclusion of Royalty in Assessable Value - Central Excise Act, 1944, Section 4 - The court held that the royalty charged for the use of the trademark was an integral part of the consideration for the sale of concentrate, thus includible in the assessable value. The agreement between the appellant and bottlers indicated that the sale of concentrate and the payment of royalty were inextricably linked, making the invoice price not the sole consideration (Paras 1-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the royalty amount collected by the appellant from the bottlers for use of the trademark is includible in the assessable value of the concentrates.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, affirming the Tribunal's decision that the royalty is an integral part of the consideration for the sale of concentrate and is thus includible in the assessable value under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

Law Points

  • Central Excise Act
  • valuation of goods
  • royalty charges
  • assessable value
  • trademark licensing
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2003 LawText (SC) (11) 19

Appeal (civil) 4051 of 1996, Appeal (civil) 1385 of 1999

2003-11-25

P. Venkatarama Reddi, Dr. AR. Lakshmanan

M/s Pepsi Foods Limited

Collector of Central Excise, Chandigarh

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeals regarding the inclusion of royalty charges in the assessable value of concentrates.

Remedy Sought

M/s Pepsi Foods Limited sought to exclude royalty from the assessable value.

Filing Reason

The Central Excise authorities proposed including royalty charges in the assessable value of concentrates.

Previous Decisions

The adjudicating authority and the Tribunal upheld the inclusion of royalty in the assessable value.

Issues

Whether the royalty amount is includible in the assessable value of concentrates. Whether the sale of concentrate and the collection of royalty are independent transactions.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the sale of concentrate and the royalty collection are separate transactions. The respondent contended that the sale of concentrate is linked to the payment of royalty for trademark use.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the royalty charged for the use of the trademark was an integral part of the consideration for the sale of concentrate, thus includible in the assessable value.

Judgment Excerpts

The question raised in these appeals filed by the assessee under Section 35L(b) of the Central Excise Act is whether the royalty amount collected by it from the bottlers for use of the trademark 'lehar' on the soft drink beverages manufactured out of the 'concentrate' sold by the appellant is includible in the assessable value of the concentrates. The Tribunal observed thus: 'It is thus plain that the licence to use the appellant’s trademark is granted to the bottlers bound up with obligation to purchase the concentrate only from the appellants.'

Procedural History

The appellant filed pricelists for the periods 1.9.1992 to 31.3.1993 and 1.4.1993 to 31.12.1993. Show cause notices were issued by the Assistant Collector proposing the inclusion of royalty charges. The adjudicating authority overruled the objections and confirmed the inclusion. The Tribunal upheld the decision, leading to the current appeals.

Acts & Sections

  • Central Excise Act, 1944: Section 4
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Disciplinary Action Against Police Officer — No Perversion Found.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Accused to Participate in 'B' Summary Report Proceedings — Right of Hearing Not Denied to Accused Under Section 173 CrPC. The accused is entitled to be heard before the Magistrate decides on a 'B' summary report, as the dec...