Supreme Court Addresses State's Liability for Employee Salaries in Public Sector Undertakings — Court emphasizes State's constitutional obligation to protect employees' rights.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The writ petition was filed by a public-spirited citizen, Kapila Hingorani, against the State of Bihar regarding the non-payment of salaries to employees of various state-owned corporations and public sector undertakings. The petitioner highlighted the dire consequences of this non-payment, including starvation deaths and suicides among employees. The court noted that numerous employees had not received their salaries for extended periods, with some cases dating back several years. The State of Bihar, in its counter affidavit, acknowledged the non-payment but claimed that salaries were being paid by certain statutory authorities. However, the court found the State's assertions inconsistent and lacking credibility. The petitioner argued that the State could not evade its responsibility for the welfare of its employees, even if they were technically employed by corporations. The court appointed an amicus curiae to assist in the investigation of the claims made by the petitioner. The amicus curiae reported that the allegations of starvation deaths were substantiated. The court deliberated on whether the corporate veil could be lifted to hold the State accountable for the actions of its corporations. Ultimately, the court concluded that the State of Bihar had a constitutional obligation to protect the rights of its employees under Articles 21 and 23 of the Constitution, emphasizing that the State's pervasive control over these corporations rendered it liable for ensuring the payment of salaries. The court directed that the State must take immediate action to address the salary arrears and safeguard the rights of the employees.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Right to Life - State's Liability for Salaries - Constitution of India, 1950, Articles 21, 23 - The State of Bihar was held constitutionally obligated to ensure payment of salaries to employees of state-owned corporations, as non-payment led to starvation deaths, violating their right to life. The court emphasized that the State's deep control over these corporations necessitated accountability for the welfare of employees (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Extent of the Government of Bihar's vicarious liability for payment of salaries to employees of state-owned corporations and public sector undertakings

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court held that the State of Bihar had a constitutional obligation to ensure payment of salaries to employees of state-owned corporations, emphasizing that the State's deep control over these corporations rendered it liable for safeguarding the rights of employees under Articles 21 and 23 of the Constitution. The court directed the State to take immediate action to address the salary arrears and protect the rights of the employees.

Law Points

  • Vicarious liability
  • constitutional obligations
  • corporate veil
  • human rights
  • starvation deaths
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2003 LawText (SC) (05) 30

Writ Petition (civil) 488 of 2002

2003-05-09

V.N. Khare, S.B. Sinha

2003 Supp(1) SCR 175

Kapila Hingorani, Shanti Bhushan, Soli J. Sorabjee, P.S. Mishra, Amarendra Sharan

Kapila Hingorani

State of Bihar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition concerning non-payment of salaries to employees of state-owned corporations.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought directions for payment of salaries to employees.

Filing Reason

Allegations of starvation deaths and suicides due to non-payment of salaries.

Previous Decisions

State of Bihar acknowledged non-payment but claimed salaries were being paid by some statutory authorities.

Issues

Whether the State of Bihar is vicariously liable for the non-payment of salaries to employees of state-owned corporations. Whether the corporate veil can be lifted to hold the State accountable for the actions of its corporations.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the State cannot evade its responsibility for the welfare of its employees. State contended that salaries were being paid by certain statutory authorities and liability cannot be shifted to the Union of India.

Ratio Decidendi

The State of Bihar, as the sole shareholder of state-owned corporations, has a constitutional obligation to ensure the payment of salaries to employees, as non-payment violates their right to life and liberty under Articles 21 and 23 of the Constitution of India.

Judgment Excerpts

The core question involved in this writ petition is to what extent the Government of the State of Bihar is vicariously liable for payment of arrears of salaries. The records of this case bear out that deaths had occurred owing to starvation or malnutrition. The State having regard to its right of supervision and/or deep and pervasive control, cannot be permitted to say that it did not know the actual state of affairs.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed in 2002, and the Supreme Court appointed an amicus curiae to assist in the investigation of the claims made by the petitioner. The court deliberated on the constitutional obligations of the State and the liability concerning the non-payment of salaries.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 21, 23, 298
  • Indian Companies Act:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Proprietor in Cheque Dishonour Case Despite Limitation Bar. Section 319 CrPC Can Be Invoked After Cognizance to Add Accused Even if Direct Complaint Would Be Time-Barred.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Section 295-A IPC Case for Lack of Deliberate and Malicious Intention. Exhibition of Slippers with Images of Hindu Deities Did Not Disclose Intent to Outrage Religious Feelings Under Section 295-A of Indian Penal Code...